[PATCH v3 0/4] crypto: aegis128 enhancements

[Ard Biesheuvel]

On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 10:43, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 10:37, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ard,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:38 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org> wrote:
> > > This series supersedes [0] '[PATCH] crypto: aegis128/neon - optimize tail
> > > block handling', which is included as patch #3 here, but hasn't been
> > > modified substantially.
> > >
> > > Patch #1 should probably go to -stable, even though aegis128 does not appear
> > > to be widely used.
> > >
> > > Patches #2 and #3 improve the SIMD code paths.
> > >
> > > Patch #4 enables fuzz testing for the SIMD code by registering the generic
> > > code as a separate driver if the SIMD code path is enabled.
> > >
> > > Changes since v2:
> > > - add Ondrej's ack to #1
> > > - fix an issue spotted by Ondrej in #4 where the generic code path would still
> > >   use some of the SIMD helpers
> > >
> > > Cc: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnacek at gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers at kernel.org>
> > >
> > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20201107195516.13952-1-ardb@kernel.org/
> > >
> > > Ard Biesheuvel (4):
> > >   crypto: aegis128 - wipe plaintext and tag if decryption fails
> > >   crypto: aegis128/neon - optimize tail block handling
> > >   crypto: aegis128/neon - move final tag check to SIMD domain
> >
> > crypto/aegis128-core.c: In function ‘crypto_aegis128_decrypt’:
> > crypto/aegis128-core.c:454:40: error: passing argument 2 of
> > ‘crypto_aegis128_process_crypt’ from incompatible pointer type
> > [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> >   454 |    crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(NULL, req, &walk,
> >       |                                        ^~~
> >       |                                        |
> >       |                                        struct aead_request *
> > crypto/aegis128-core.c:335:29: note: expected ‘struct skcipher_walk *’
> > but argument is of type ‘struct aead_request *’
> >   335 |       struct skcipher_walk *walk,
> >       |       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
> > crypto/aegis128-core.c:454:45: error: passing argument 3 of
> > ‘crypto_aegis128_process_crypt’ from incompatible pointer type
> > [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> >   454 |    crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(NULL, req, &walk,
> >       |                                             ^~~~~
> >       |                                             |
> >       |                                             struct skcipher_walk *
> > crypto/aegis128-core.c:336:14: note: expected ‘void (*)(struct
> > aegis_state *, u8 *, const u8 *, unsigned int)’ {aka ‘void (*)(struct
> > aegis_state *, unsigned char *, const unsigned char *, unsigned int)’}
> > but argument is of type ‘struct skcipher_walk *’
> >   336 |       void (*crypt)(struct aegis_state *state,
> >       |       ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >   337 |              u8 *dst, const u8 *src,
> >       |              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >   338 |              unsigned int size))
> >       |              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > crypto/aegis128-core.c:454:4: error: too many arguments to function
> > ‘crypto_aegis128_process_crypt’
> >   454 |    crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(NULL, req, &walk,
> >       |    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > crypto/aegis128-core.c:334:5: note: declared here
> >   334 | int crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(struct aegis_state *state,
> >       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:283: crypto/aegis128-core.o] Error 1
> >
> > >   crypto: aegis128 - expose SIMD code path as separate driver
> >
> > Fixes the above, but causes
> >
> > ERROR: modpost: "crypto_aegis128_update_simd" [crypto/aegis128.ko] undefined!
> >
> > as reported by noreply at ellerman.id.au for m68k/defconfig and
> > m68k/sun3_defconfig.
> > (neon depends on arm).
> >
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> It seems like GCC is not optimizing away calls to routines that are
> unreachable. Which GCC version are you using?

Also, mind checking whether the below works around this?

diff --git a/crypto/aegis128-core.c b/crypto/aegis128-core.c
index 2b05f79475d3..89dc1c559689 100644
--- a/crypto/aegis128-core.c
+++ b/crypto/aegis128-core.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_update_a(struct
aegis_state *state,
                                     const union aegis_block *msg,
                                     bool do_simd)
 {
-       if (do_simd) {
+       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEGIS128_SIMD) && do_simd) {
                crypto_aegis128_update_simd(state, msg);
                return;
        }
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_update_a(struct
aegis_state *state,
 static void crypto_aegis128_update_u(struct aegis_state *state, const
void *msg,
                                     bool do_simd)
 {
-       if (do_simd) {
+       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEGIS128_SIMD) && do_simd) {
                crypto_aegis128_update_simd(state, msg);
                return;
        }