[PATCH v15 6/9] arm64/kvm: Add hypercall service for kvm ptp.

[Jianyong Wu]

Hi Marc,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 5:07 PM
> To: Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu at arm.com>
> Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org; yangbo.lu at nxp.com; john.stultz at linaro.org;
> tglx at linutronix.de; pbonzini at redhat.com; sean.j.christopherson at intel.com;
> richardcochran at gmail.com; Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland at arm.com>;
> will at kernel.org; Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose at arm.com>; Andre
> Przywara <Andre.Przywara at arm.com>; Steven Price
> <Steven.Price at arm.com>; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org; kvmarm at lists.cs.columbia.edu;
> kvm at vger.kernel.org; Steve Capper <Steve.Capper at arm.com>; Justin He
> <Justin.He at arm.com>; nd <nd at arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 6/9] arm64/kvm: Add hypercall service for kvm ptp.
> 
> On 2020-11-24 05:20, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> > Hi Marc,
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> > +/* ptp_kvm counter type ID */
> >> > +#define ARM_PTP_VIRT_COUNTER			0
> >> > +#define ARM_PTP_PHY_COUNTER			1
> >> > +#define ARM_PTP_NONE_COUNTER			2
> >>
> >> The architecture definitely doesn't have this last counter.
> >
> > Yeah, this is just represent no counter data needed from guest.
> > Some annotation should be added here.
> 
> I'd rather you remove it entirely, or explain why you really cannot do without
> a fake counter.

OK, I will remove it.

Thanks
Jianyong
> 
>          M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...