[PATCH v5 5/9] task_isolation: Add driver-specific hooks

Alex Belits abelits at marvell.com
Mon Nov 23 12:57:42 EST 2020


Some drivers don't call functions that call
task_isolation_kernel_enter() in interrupt handlers. Call it
directly.

Signed-off-by: Alex Belits <abelits at marvell.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c | 6 ++++++
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c        | 3 +++
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c           | 3 +++
 drivers/s390/cio/cio.c              | 3 +++
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c
index d7eb2e93db8f..4ac7babe1abe 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
 #include <linux/msi.h>
+#include <linux/isolation.h>
 #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
 #include <asm/exception.h>
 #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
@@ -572,6 +573,7 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops armada_370_xp_mpic_irq_ops = {
 static void armada_370_xp_handle_msi_irq(struct pt_regs *regs, bool is_chained)
 {
 	u32 msimask, msinr;
+	int isol_entered = 0;
 
 	msimask = readl_relaxed(per_cpu_int_base +
 				ARMADA_370_XP_IN_DRBEL_CAUSE_OFFS)
@@ -588,6 +590,10 @@ static void armada_370_xp_handle_msi_irq(struct pt_regs *regs, bool is_chained)
 			continue;
 
 		if (is_chained) {
+			if (!isol_entered) {
+				task_isolation_kernel_enter();
+				isol_entered = 1;
+			}
 			irq = irq_find_mapping(armada_370_xp_msi_inner_domain,
 					       msinr - PCI_MSI_DOORBELL_START);
 			generic_handle_irq(irq);
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 16fecc0febe8..ded26dd4da0f 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/refcount.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/isolation.h>
 
 #include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h>
@@ -646,6 +647,8 @@ static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry gic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs
 {
 	u32 irqnr;
 
+	task_isolation_kernel_enter();
+
 	irqnr = gic_read_iar();
 
 	if (gic_supports_nmi() &&
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index 6053245a4754..bb482b4ae218 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/isolation.h>
 #include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
 #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h>
@@ -337,6 +338,8 @@ static void __exception_irq_entry gic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	struct gic_chip_data *gic = &gic_data[0];
 	void __iomem *cpu_base = gic_data_cpu_base(gic);
 
+	task_isolation_kernel_enter();
+
 	do {
 		irqstat = readl_relaxed(cpu_base + GIC_CPU_INTACK);
 		irqnr = irqstat & GICC_IAR_INT_ID_MASK;
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/cio.c b/drivers/s390/cio/cio.c
index 6d716db2a46a..beab88881b6d 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/cio.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/cio.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/isolation.h>
 #include <asm/cio.h>
 #include <asm/delay.h>
 #include <asm/irq.h>
@@ -584,6 +585,8 @@ void cio_tsch(struct subchannel *sch)
 	struct irb *irb;
 	int irq_context;
 
+	task_isolation_kernel_enter();
+
 	irb = this_cpu_ptr(&cio_irb);
 	/* Store interrupt response block to lowcore. */
 	if (tsch(sch->schid, irb) != 0)
-- 
2.20.1



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list