[PATCH] arm64: abort counter_read_on_cpu() when irqs_disabled()
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Fri Nov 13 12:30:12 EST 2020
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:58:43PM +0000, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> On Friday 13 Nov 2020 at 16:02:34 (+0000), Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 03:53:28PM +0000, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> > > Given that smp_call_function_single() can deadlock when interrupts are
> > > disabled, abort the SMP call if irqs_disabled(). This scenario is
> > > currently not possible given the function's uses, but safeguard this for
> > > potential future uses.
> >
> > Sorry to contradict earlier feedback, but I think this is preferable
> > as-is, since smp_call_function_single() will
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled())), but this will silently mask any dodgy
> > usage.
>
> Probably it only contradicts the chosen implementation.
>
> >
> > If we want a separate check here, I reckon we should wrap it with a
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(), and only relax that if/when we have a legitimate case
> > for calling this with IRQs disabled.
> >
>
> That's fair. I'll replace the condition below with:
>
> if (!cpu_has_amu_feat(cpu))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled())
> return -EPERM;
That'd be great, thanks!
With that, feel free to add:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
Mark.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list