[PATCH 1/1] arm64: Accelerate Adler32 using arm64 SVE instructions.

[Li Qiang]

Hi Eric,

在 2020/11/5 1:57, Eric Biggers 写道:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 08:15:06PM +0800, l00374334 wrote:
>> From: liqiang <liqiang64 at huawei.com>
>>
>> 	In the libz library, the checksum algorithm adler32 usually occupies
>> 	a relatively high hot spot, and the SVE instruction set can easily
>> 	accelerate it, so that the performance of libz library will be
>> 	significantly improved.
>>
>> 	We can divides buf into blocks according to the bit width of SVE,
>> 	and then uses vector registers to perform operations in units of blocks
>> 	to achieve the purpose of acceleration.
>>
>> 	On machines that support ARM64 sve instructions, this algorithm is
>> 	about 3~4 times faster than the algorithm implemented in C language
>> 	in libz. The wider the SVE instruction, the better the acceleration effect.
>>
>> 	Measured on a Taishan 1951 machine that supports 256bit width SVE,
>> 	below are the results of my measured random data of 1M and 10M:
>>
>> 		[root at xxx adler32]# ./benchmark 1000000
>> 		Libz alg: Time used:    608 us, 1644.7 Mb/s.
>> 		SVE  alg: Time used:    166 us, 6024.1 Mb/s.
>>
>> 		[root at xxx adler32]# ./benchmark 10000000
>> 		Libz alg: Time used:   6484 us, 1542.3 Mb/s.
>> 		SVE  alg: Time used:   2034 us, 4916.4 Mb/s.
>>
>> 	The blocks can be of any size, so the algorithm can automatically adapt
>> 	to SVE hardware with different bit widths without modifying the code.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: liqiang <liqiang64 at huawei.com>
> 
> Note that this patch does nothing to actually wire up the kernel's copy of libz
> (lib/zlib_{deflate,inflate}/) to use this implementation of Adler32.  To do so,
> libz would either need to be changed to use the shash API, or you'd need to
> implement an adler32() function in lib/crypto/ that automatically uses an
> accelerated implementation if available, and make libz call it.
> 
> Also, in either case a C implementation would be required too.  There can't be
> just an architecture-specific implementation.

Okay, thank you for the problems and suggestions you gave. I will continue to
improve my code.

> 
> Also as others have pointed out, there's probably not much point in having a SVE
> implementation of Adler32 when there isn't even a NEON implementation yet.  It's
> not too hard to implement Adler32 using NEON, and there are already several
> permissively-licensed NEON implementations out there that could be used as a
> reference, e.g. my implementation using NEON instrinsics here:
> https://github.com/ebiggers/libdeflate/blob/v1.6/lib/arm/adler32_impl.h
> 
> - Eric
> .
> 

I am very happy to get this NEON implementation code. :)

-- 
Best regards,
Li Qiang