[PATCH v9 4/4] gpio: xilinx: Utilize generic bitmap_get_value and _set_value.
Syed Nayyar Waris
syednwaris at gmail.com
Sat Jun 27 04:14:23 EDT 2020
This patch reimplements the xgpio_set_multiple function in
drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c to use the new generic functions:
bitmap_get_value and bitmap_set_value. The code is now simpler
to read and understand. Moreover, instead of looping for each bit
in xgpio_set_multiple function, now we can check each channel at
a time and save cycles.
---
Changes in v9:
- Remove looping of 'for_each_set_clump' and instead process two
halves of a 64-bit bitmap separately or individually. Use normal spin_lock
call for second inner lock. And take the spin_lock_init call outside the 'if'
condition in the 'probe' function of driver.
Changes in v8:
- No change.
Changes in v7:
- No change.
Changes in v6:
- No change.
Changes in v5:
- Minor change: Inline values '32' and '64' in code for better
code readability.
Changes in v4:
- Minor change: Inline values '32' and '64' in code for better
code readability.
Changes in v3:
- No change.
Changes in v2:
- No change
drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
index 67f9f82e0db0..48393d06fb55 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
@@ -136,39 +136,39 @@ static void xgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
static void xgpio_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned long *mask,
unsigned long *bits)
{
- unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned long flag;
struct xgpio_instance *chip = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- int index = xgpio_index(chip, 0);
- int offset, i;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
-
- /* Write to GPIO signals */
- for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++) {
- if (*mask == 0)
- break;
- /* Once finished with an index write it out to the register */
- if (index != xgpio_index(chip, i)) {
- xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET +
- index * XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET,
- chip->gpio_state[index]);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
- index = xgpio_index(chip, i);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
- }
- if (__test_and_clear_bit(i, mask)) {
- offset = xgpio_offset(chip, i);
- if (test_bit(i, bits))
- chip->gpio_state[index] |= BIT(offset);
- else
- chip->gpio_state[index] &= ~BIT(offset);
- }
- }
-
- xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET +
- index * XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET, chip->gpio_state[index]);
-
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
+ u32 *const state = chip->gpio_state;
+ unsigned int *const width = chip->gpio_width;
+
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(old, 64);
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(new, 64);
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(changed, 64);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[0], flag);
+ spin_lock(&chip->gpio_lock[1]);
+
+ bitmap_set_value(old, state[0], 0, width[0]);
+ bitmap_set_value(old, state[1], width[0], width[1]);
+ bitmap_replace(new, old, bits, mask, gc->ngpio);
+
+ bitmap_set_value(old, state[0], 0, 32);
+ bitmap_set_value(old, state[1], 32, 32);
+ state[0] = bitmap_get_value(new, 0, width[0]);
+ state[1] = bitmap_get_value(new, width[0], width[1]);
+ bitmap_set_value(new, state[0], 0, 32);
+ bitmap_set_value(new, state[1], 32, 32);
+ bitmap_xor(changed, old, new, 64);
+
+ if (((u32 *)changed)[0])
+ xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET,
+ state[0]);
+ if (((u32 *)changed)[1])
+ xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET +
+ XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET, state[1]);
+
+ spin_unlock(&chip->gpio_lock[1]);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[0], flag);
}
/**
@@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ static int xgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
chip->gpio_width[0] = 32;
spin_lock_init(&chip->gpio_lock[0]);
+ spin_lock_init(&chip->gpio_lock[1]);
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "xlnx,is-dual", &is_dual))
is_dual = 0;
@@ -314,7 +315,6 @@ static int xgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
&chip->gpio_width[1]))
chip->gpio_width[1] = 32;
- spin_lock_init(&chip->gpio_lock[1]);
}
chip->gc.base = -1;
--
2.26.2
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list