[PATCH v2 1/3] mfd: core: Make a best effort attempt to match devices with the correct of_nodes
lee.jones at linaro.org
Wed Jun 24 12:14:35 EDT 2020
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 2020-06-24 02:46, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Jun 2020, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >> On 2020-06-23 14:59, Lee Jones wrote:
> < big snip >
> Thanks for the replies in the above portion.
> >>>> But yes or no to my solution #2 (with some slight changes to
> >>>> make it better (more gracious handling of the detected error) as
> >>>> discussed elsewhere in the email thread)?
> >>> Please see "" above!
> >>> AFAICT your solution #2 involves bombing out *all* devices if there is
> >>> a duplicate compatible with no 'reg' property value. This is a)
> >>> over-kill and b) not an error, as I mentioned:
> >> As I mentioned above, I set you up to have this misunderstanding by
> >> a mistake in one of my earlier emails. So now that I have pointed
> >> out what I meant here by "more gracious handling of the detected
> >> error", what do you think of my amended solution #2?
> > Explained above, but the LT;DR is that it's not correct.
> I don't agree with you, I think my solution is better. Even if I
> prefer my solution, I find your solution to be good enough.
I still don't see how it could work, but please feel free to submit a
subsequent patch and we can discuss it on its own merits.
> So I am dropping my specific objection to returning -EAGAIN from
> mfd_match_of_node_to_dev() when the node has previously been
> allocated to a device.
Great. Thanks for taking an interest.
Does this mean I can apply your Reviewed-by?
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel