[PATCH v4 3/5] irqchip/irq-pruss-intc: Add logic for handling reserved interrupts

[Grzegorz Jaszczyk]

On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 20:48, David Lechner <david at lechnology.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/28/20 4:18 AM, Grzegorz Jaszczyk wrote:
> > From: Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com>
> >
> > The PRUSS INTC has a fixed number of output interrupt lines that are
> > connected to a number of processors or other PRUSS instances or other
> > devices (like DMA) on the SoC. The output interrupt lines 2 through 9
> > are usually connected to the main Arm host processor and are referred
> > to as host interrupts 0 through 7 from ARM/MPU perspective.
> >
> > All of these 8 host interrupts are not always exclusively connected
> > to the Arm interrupt controller. Some SoCs have some interrupt lines
> > not connected to the Arm interrupt controller at all, while a few others
> > have the interrupt lines connected to multiple processors in which they
> > need to be partitioned as per SoC integration needs. For example, AM437x
> > and 66AK2G SoCs have 2 PRUSS instances each and have the host interrupt 5
> > connected to the other PRUSS, while AM335x has host interrupt 0 shared
> > between MPU and TSC_ADC and host interrupts 6 & 7 shared between MPU and
> > a DMA controller.
> >
> > Add logic to the PRUSS INTC driver to ignore both these shared and
> > invalid interrupts.
>
> If a person wanted to use DMA with a PRU what will handle the mapping
> of a PRU event to host interrupt 6 or 7 if they are being ignored here?

Mapping can be handled independently: even if a given host interrupt
is on irqs-reserved list, the mapping description for it can be
provided (e.g. similar to the resource table case passed through rproc
subsystem) and nothing prevents this driver from actually routing it.

>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > v3->v4:
> > - Due to changes in DT bindings which converts irqs-reserved
> >    property from uint8-array to bitmask requested by Rob introduce
> >    relevant changes in the driver.
> > - Merge the irqs-reserved and irqs-shared to one property since they
> >    can be handled by one logic (relevant change was introduced to DT
> >    binding).
> > - Update commit message.
> > v2->v3:
> > - Extra checks for (intc->irqs[i]) in error/remove path was moved from
> >    "irqchip/irq-pruss-intc: Add a PRUSS irqchip driver for PRUSS
> >    interrupts" to this patch
> > v1->v2:
> > - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11069757/
> > ---
> >   drivers/irqchip/irq-pruss-intc.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-pruss-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-pruss-intc.c
> > index 45b966a..cf9a59b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-pruss-intc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-pruss-intc.c
> > @@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ static int pruss_intc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       struct pruss_intc *intc;
> >       struct pruss_host_irq_data *host_data[MAX_NUM_HOST_IRQS] = { NULL };
> >       int i, irq, ret;
> > -     u8 max_system_events;
> > +     u8 max_system_events, invalid_intr = 0;
> >
> >       data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> >       if (!data)
> > @@ -496,6 +496,16 @@ static int pruss_intc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >               return PTR_ERR(intc->base);
> >       }
> >
> > +     ret = of_property_read_u8(dev->of_node, "ti,irqs-reserved",
> > +                               &invalid_intr);
>
> Why not make the variable name match the property name?

Sure, I will rename this variable.

Thank you for your review,
Grzegorz