[PATCH V8 1/6] clk: imx6sl: Use BIT(x) to avoid shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits
Anson Huang
Anson.Huang at nxp.com
Wed Jul 29 19:58:35 EDT 2020
Use readl_relaxed() instead of __raw_readl(), and use BIT(x)
instead of (1 << X) to fix below build warning reported by kernel
test robot:
drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6sl.c:149:49: warning: Shifting signed 32-bit
value by 31 bits is undefined behaviour [shiftTooManyBitsSigned]
while (!(__raw_readl(anatop_base + PLL_ARM) & BM_PLL_ARM_LOCK))
Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang at nxp.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
---
changes since V7:
- remove unnecessary linux/bitfield.h include.
---
drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6sl.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6sl.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6sl.c
index 0f647d1..8894876 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6sl.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6sl.c
@@ -14,19 +14,19 @@
#include "clk.h"
#define CCSR 0xc
-#define BM_CCSR_PLL1_SW_CLK_SEL (1 << 2)
+#define BM_CCSR_PLL1_SW_CLK_SEL BIT(2)
#define CACRR 0x10
#define CDHIPR 0x48
-#define BM_CDHIPR_ARM_PODF_BUSY (1 << 16)
+#define BM_CDHIPR_ARM_PODF_BUSY BIT(16)
#define ARM_WAIT_DIV_396M 2
#define ARM_WAIT_DIV_792M 4
#define ARM_WAIT_DIV_996M 6
#define PLL_ARM 0x0
-#define BM_PLL_ARM_DIV_SELECT (0x7f << 0)
-#define BM_PLL_ARM_POWERDOWN (1 << 12)
-#define BM_PLL_ARM_ENABLE (1 << 13)
-#define BM_PLL_ARM_LOCK (1 << 31)
+#define BM_PLL_ARM_DIV_SELECT 0x7f
+#define BM_PLL_ARM_POWERDOWN BIT(12)
+#define BM_PLL_ARM_ENABLE BIT(13)
+#define BM_PLL_ARM_LOCK BIT(31)
#define PLL_ARM_DIV_792M 66
static const char *step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", };
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static void imx6sl_enable_pll_arm(bool enable)
val |= BM_PLL_ARM_ENABLE;
val &= ~BM_PLL_ARM_POWERDOWN;
writel_relaxed(val, anatop_base + PLL_ARM);
- while (!(__raw_readl(anatop_base + PLL_ARM) & BM_PLL_ARM_LOCK))
+ while (!(readl_relaxed(anatop_base + PLL_ARM) & BM_PLL_ARM_LOCK))
;
} else {
writel_relaxed(saved_pll_arm, anatop_base + PLL_ARM);
--
2.7.4
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list