[PATCH v4 00/10] Adding support for Microchip Sparx5 SoC
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Mon Jul 27 07:07:14 EDT 2020
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:30 PM Lars Povlsen
<lars.povlsen at microchip.com> wrote:
> Alexandre Belloni writes:
> > As Arnd stated, he already applied the patches so you have to send an
> > incremental patch to fix the clock driver.
> >
>
> I actually wrote Arnd about this specifically, and he replied that a
> patch against either next or mainline was fine - so that's why I
> refreshed the lot (Including Reviewed-by: headers).
I think I misunderstood your question. To clarify: Alexandre is right,
you should not resend patches that have already been merged but
instead send the incremental patches if you need further changes.
I thought your question was about the case where your patch
series has conflicts against another unrelated set of changes
that may have been merged already.
> But I will send an incremental patch just in case, no problem.
Thanks,
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list