[PATCH v3 1/6] usb: gadget: udc: atmel: use of_find_matching_node_and_match

Claudiu.Beznea at microchip.com Claudiu.Beznea at microchip.com
Thu Jul 23 12:28:53 EDT 2020



On 22.07.2020 17:43, Claudiu.Beznea at microchip.com wrote:
> 
> 
> On 22.07.2020 16:44, cristian.birsan at microchip.com wrote:
>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea at microchip.com>
>>
>> Instead of trying to match every possible compatible use
>> of_find_matching_node_and_match() and pass the compatible array.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea at microchip.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
>> index c5128c229c52..ee2b550aa400 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
>> @@ -2112,6 +2112,13 @@ static const struct of_device_id atmel_udc_dt_ids[] = {
>>  
>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_udc_dt_ids);
>>  
>> +static const struct of_device_id atmel_pmc_dt_ids[] = {
>> +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-pmc" },
>> +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9rl-pmc" },
>> +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-pmc" },
>> +	{ /* sentinel */ }
>> +};
>> +
>>  static struct usba_ep * atmel_udc_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>  						    struct usba_udc *udc)
>>  {
>> @@ -2128,13 +2135,17 @@ static struct usba_ep * atmel_udc_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>  
>>  	udc_config = match->data;
>>  	udc->errata = udc_config->errata;
>> -	udc->pmc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91sam9g45-pmc");
>> -	if (IS_ERR(udc->pmc))
>> -		udc->pmc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91sam9rl-pmc");
>> -	if (IS_ERR(udc->pmc))
>> -		udc->pmc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91sam9x5-pmc");
>> -	if (udc->errata && IS_ERR(udc->pmc))
>> -		return ERR_CAST(udc->pmc);
>> +	if (udc->errata) {
>> +		pp = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, atmel_pmc_dt_ids,
>> +						     NULL);
>> +		if (!pp)
>> +			return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> +
>> +		udc->pmc = syscon_node_to_regmap(pp);
>> +		of_node_put(pp);
>> +		if (IS_ERR(udc->pmc))
>> +			return ERR_CAST(udc->pmc);
>> +	}
> 
> This seems a bit not similar. I may had been wrong at the moment I wrote
> this patch. Probably the best would be:
> 
> +	udc->pmc = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +	pp = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, atmel_pmc_dt_ids,
> +					     NULL);
> +	if (pp) {
> +		udc->pmc = syscon_node_to_regmap(pp);
> +		of_node_put(pp);
> +	}
> +
> +	if ((!pp || IS_ERR(udc->pmc)) && udc->errata)
> +		return ERR_CAST(udc->pmc);

Actually, the initial patch should be good and simpler than what I proposed
in previous email. Please ignore it.

Sorry for the noise!

> 
> Thank you,
> Claudiu Beznea
> 
>>  
>>  	udc->num_ep = 0;
>>  
>>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list