[GIT PULL 6/7] ARM: tegra: Default configuration changes for v5.9-rc1
Dmitry Osipenko
digetx at gmail.com
Fri Jul 17 16:25:14 EDT 2020
17.07.2020 23:23, Arnd Bergmann пишет:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:13 PM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 17.07.2020 22:24, Arnd Bergmann пишет:
>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 6:13 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> ARM: tegra: Default configuration changes for v5.9-rc1
>>>>
>>>> Enables a few new configuration options that are useful on the new Nexus
>>>> 7 and Acer A500 devices, as well as the userspace CPU frequency governor
>>>> that's mainly used for testing.
>>>
>>> I've pulled all the other branches, but I'm a little bit wary about
>>> this one since
>>> Dmitry's patch enables a number of options that would increase the kernel
>>> size, and I see no indication that it has been reviewed by anyone else.
>>>
>>> I think the changes all make sense, but I would prefer to have a wider
>>> audience for that patch and get some Acks. If you like, you can send the
>>> tegra specific changes in a new pull request in the meantime, and then
>>> send the remaining additions to the usual suspects as an RFC, with
>>> Cc:soc at kernel.org, so I can apply it later if everyone is happy enough
>>> with it.
>>
>> Hello, Arnd!
>>
>> But these are already the tegra specific changes. The patch changes
>> tegra_defconfig and not the multi_v7_defconfig.
>>
>> Could you please clarify from whom would you expect to get more Acks if
>> not from the tegra maintainers?
>>
>> In practice nobody uses upstream defconfig as-is, it's only used as
>> initial template. So I'm not sure why tegra-kernel size makes you to
>> worry. Could you please explain?
>
> It was a mistake on my end, for some reason I thought you were
> changing the arm64 defconfig, which does not have per-platform
> files.
>
> The patch is good, and I'll pull the branch as soon as I get to it
> (it's a bit late for today).
Awesome, thank you!
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list