[PATCH 09/13] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Remove unused ID structs

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 1:34 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:27 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 15-07-20, 08:54, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > > On 14-07-20, 22:03, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 14 Jul 2020, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 4:51 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can't see them being used anywhere and the compiler doesn't complain
> > > > > > > that they're missing, so ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Aren't they needed for automatic module loading in certain configurations?
> > > > >
> > > > > Any idea how that works, or where the code is for that?
> > > >
> > > > The MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() thingy creates a map of vendor-id,
> > > > product-id that the kernel keeps after boot (and so there is no static
> > > > reference of it for the compiler), later when a device is hotplugged
> > > > into the kernel it refers to the map to find the related driver for it
> > > > and loads it if it isn't already loaded.
> > > >
> > > > This has some of it, search for MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() in it.
> > > > Documentation/driver-api/usb/hotplug.rst
> > >
> > > And you just need to add __maybe_unused to them to suppress the
> > > warning.
> >
> > Wouldn't that cause the compiler to optimize them away if it doesn't
> > see any users?
>
> It looks like they're only unused when !MODULE,

OK

> in which case optimising them away would be the correct thing to do, no?