[PATCH 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq
Lee Jones
lee.jones at linaro.org
Wed Jul 15 02:32:14 EDT 2020
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote:
> > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
> > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
> > niggly little warnings.
> >
> > After these patches are applied, the build system no longer
> > complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in drivers/cpufreq.
>
> And you need to rebase this stuff of pm/linux-next, as there are some
> changes in cpufreq.c there.
It's based on the latest -next. Is pm/linux-next in -next?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list