[PATCH 00/13] Add IPU & DSP remoteprocs on OMAP4 and OMAP5

Suman Anna s-anna at ti.com
Fri Jul 10 14:24:17 EDT 2020


On 7/10/20 12:40 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com> [200710 17:18]:
>> On 7/10/20 11:58 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> I wonder the following commit in v5.8-rc3 might help with this though:
>>>
>>> 5ce8aee81be6 ("bus: ti-sysc: Flush posted write on enable and disable")
>>>
>>
>> I had already tested on v5.8-rc4 when I posted the patches, so this patch
>> doesn't help. OMAP5 DSP is fine, because Think it has to do with this
>> automated
> 
> OK
> 
>> So, I am looking at the TRM, and the three VDD_{IVA,MPU,CORE}_I2C_DISABLE
>> bits in VOLTCTRL are marked debug-purpose only, so I don't think we should
>> be setting those to begin with. Any reason why you want to set those?
>> Anyway, these bits were not an issue, I have specifically tried that
>> already.
> 
> I'm pretty sure that's how the old TI PM branch was initializing them to
> disable voltctrl I2C use on init. But if these are not the issue I guess
> no need to mess with them.

OK.

> 
> Could it be that we have wrong voltage tables for 4460 in the mainline
> kernel? See earlier commit 32236a84906f ("ARM: OMAP2+: Update 4430
> voltage controller operating points").

I am running on Pandaboard, so it's a OMAP4430 ES2.2. Tried with the 
older values reverting the above commit, didn't make any difference. So, 
the only trigger point so far seems to be the automatic IVA voltage 
domain transition. Looks to be a timing related issue given that a debug 
trace also helped, wondering if it goes through a quick RET->ON->RET 
sequence from the time I disable the MMUs (child device) to the actual 
module disabling in sysc_module_disable() on the parent target-module 
device.

regards
Suman



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list