[PATCH v2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Keep the discrete clock rates sorted

[Sudeep Holla]

Instead of relying on the firmware to keep the clock rates sorted, let
us sort the list. This is not essential for clock layer but it helps
to find the min and max rates easily from the list.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200708110725.18017-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Fixes: 5f6c6430e904 ("firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for clock protocol")
Reported-by: Dien Pham <dien.pham.ry at renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at arm.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


Hi Dien-san,

If you could review/test these patches, I can queue them ASAP.
I am planning to send the PR for ARM SoC later this week, so I need
your tested-by.

v1[1]->v2:
	- Fixed the warning, sent the wrong version earlier

Regards,
Sudeep

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200708110725.18017-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
index 4c2227662b26..c90f23a812f5 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
  * Copyright (C) 2018 ARM Ltd.
  */

+#include <linux/sort.h>
+
 #include "common.h"

 enum scmi_clock_protocol_cmd {
@@ -121,6 +123,13 @@ static int scmi_clock_attributes_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
 	return ret;
 }

+static int rate_cmp_func(const void *_r1, const void *_r2)
+{
+	const u64 *r1 = _r1, *r2 = _r2;
+
+	return r1 - r2;
+}
+
 static int
 scmi_clock_describe_rates_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 clk_id,
 			      struct scmi_clock_info *clk)
@@ -184,8 +193,10 @@ scmi_clock_describe_rates_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 clk_id,
 		 */
 	} while (num_returned && num_remaining);

-	if (rate_discrete)
+	if (rate_discrete) {
 		clk->list.num_rates = tot_rate_cnt;
+		sort(rate, tot_rate_cnt, sizeof(*rate), rate_cmp_func, NULL);
+	}

 	clk->rate_discrete = rate_discrete;

--
2.17.1