[PATCH v3 4/7] dt-bindings: atmel-usart: remove wildcard

Alexandre Belloni alexandre.belloni at bootlin.com
Tue Jan 14 03:17:04 PST 2020


On 14/01/2020 11:10:14+0000, Claudiu.Beznea at microchip.com wrote:
> 
> 
> On 14.01.2020 12:42, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> > 
> > On 14/01/2020 12:23:14+0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> >> Remove chip whildcard and introduce the list of compatibles instead.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea at microchip.com>
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-usart.txt | 7 +++----
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-usart.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-usart.txt
> >> index 699fd3c9ace8..778e8310606a 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-usart.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-usart.txt
> >> @@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
> >>  * Atmel Universal Synchronous Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter (USART)
> >>
> >>  Required properties for USART:
> >> -- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-usart" or "atmel,<chip>-dbgu"
> >> -  The compatible <chip> indicated will be the first SoC to support an
> >> -  additional mode or an USART new feature.
> >> -  For the dbgu UART, use "atmel,<chip>-dbgu", "atmel,<chip>-usart"
> >> +- compatible: Should be one of the following:
> >> +     - "atmel,at91rm9200-dbgu", "atmel,at91rm9200-usart"
> >> +     - "atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu", "atmel,at91sam9260-usart"
> > 
> > All the uarts are not dbgus, so this need to be:
> > 
> >  - "atmel,at91rm9200-usart"
> >  - "atmel,at91sam9260-usart"
> >  - "atmel,at91rm9200-dbgu", "atmel,at91rm9200-usart"
> >  - "atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu", "atmel,at91sam9260-usart"
> 
> Ok!
> 
> > 
> > Also, you need to update drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> 
> OK. Did you refer to CIDR, EXID registers? They are at the same offsets as
> for the old products. So we can rely on old compatible for them. Is this OK?
> 

Then, what is the point of adding microchip,sam9x60-dbgu ?


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list