[arm-soc:sunxi/dt 49/52] Error: arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi:54.19-20 syntax error

Chen-Yu Tsai wens at kernel.org
Sun Jan 12 19:02:03 PST 2020


On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 3:51 AM Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 11:06 AM Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 8:57 AM kbuild test robot <lkp at intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git sunxi/dt
> > > head:   6163ce8467052cdfe42581036bc71fe4aac09eab
> > > commit: 7486ee80f62e610053a33e4f94fb04172c09a41a [49/52] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: add CPU clock to CPU0-3 nodes
> >
> > I can't find sunxi/dt branch in arm-soc tree nor this commit, 'git
> > show 7486ee80f62e610053a33e4f94fb04172c09a41a' complains "fatal: bad
> > object 7486ee80f62e610053a33e4f94fb04172c09a41a"
>
> Yeah, I dropped it based on these failures:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200111225938.hp6xxr4k7jp7yvv2@localhost/
>
> > > config: arm64-defconfig (attached as .config)
> > > compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0
> > > reproduce:
> > >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > >         git checkout 7486ee80f62e610053a33e4f94fb04172c09a41a
> > >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > >         GCC_VERSION=7.5.0 make.cross ARCH=arm64
> > >
> > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp at intel.com>
> > >
> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > >
> > > >> Error: arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi:54.19-20 syntax error
> >
> > Line 54 references "CLK_CPUX" in sunxi tree sunxi/for-next branch, so
> > I assume that someone merged sunxi/dt-for-5.6, but not
> > sunxi/clk-for-5.6 which exports this clock.
>
> Yeah, Maxime missed the dependency when he sent in the merge request.
> Bindings headers cause pain like this, unfortunately. We often end up
> needing a stable branch for the binding/header change and bring that
> in as a base to both clock and DT branches.

(facepalm) My bad. I missed the fact that this macro was added in this
cycle.

ChenYu



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list