[PATCH v3 0/6] fixes for atmel-hlcdc

Lee Jones lee.jones at linaro.org
Thu Jan 2 08:05:34 PST 2020


On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> Hi Lee.
> 
> How do de handle the two mfd related patches?
> 
> > I have few fixes for atmel-hlcdc driver in this series as well
> > as two reverts.
> > Revert "drm: atmel-hlcdc: enable sys_clk during initalization." is
> > due to the fix in in patch 2/5.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > Claudiu Beznea
> > 
> > Changes in v3:
> > - changes dev_err() message in patch 4/6
> > - collect Acked-by tags
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > - introduce patch 3/6
> > - use dev_err() inpatch 4/6
> > - introduce patch 5/6 instead of reverting commit f6f7ad323461
> >   ("drm/atmel-hlcdc: allow selecting a higher pixel-clock than requested")
> > 
> > Claudiu Beznea (5):
> >   drm: atmel-hlcdc: use double rate for pixel clock only if supported
> >   drm: atmel-hlcdc: enable clock before configuring timing engine
> 
> >   mfd: atmel-hlcdc: add struct device member to struct
> >     atmel_hlcdc_regmap
> >   mfd: atmel-hlcdc: return in case of error
> 
> Would it be OK to apply the to drm-misc-next, or shal they go in via
> your mfd tree?

How are they related to the other patches?  Do they have build-time
dependencies on any of the other patches, or vice versa? 

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list