[PATCH v9 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: Fix schema warnings for pwm-leds

[Lee Jones]

On Thu, 31 Dec 2020, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> > > > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain
> > > > naming scheme (now).  Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended
> > > > by DT project.
> > > > 
> > > >   DTC     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
> > > >   CHECK   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
> > > > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> > > >         From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post at lespocky.de>
> > > > Acked-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff at labundy.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> > > 
> > > Thanks, applied.
> > 
> > Sorry, what?
> > 
> > Applied to what tree?
> 
> I took it to (local copy) of leds-next tree on. But now I realised it
> is mfd, not a LED patch, so I undone that. Sorry for the confusion.
> 
> Anyway, patch still looks good to me:
> 
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz>

Thanks Pavel.

I plan on taking this next week.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog