[PATCH] drm/amd/display: Revert "add DCN support for aarch64"

[Ard Biesheuvel]

On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 23:26, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 19:00, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:53 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This reverts commit c38d444e44badc557cf29fdfdfb823604890ccfa.
> > >
> > > Simply disabling -mgeneral-regs-only left and right is risky, given that
> > > the standard AArch64 ABI permits the use of FP/SIMD registers anywhere,
> > > and GCC is known to use SIMD registers for spilling, and may invent
> > > other uses of the FP/SIMD register file that have nothing to do with the
> > > floating point code in question. Note that putting kernel_neon_begin()
> > > and kernel_neon_end() around the code that does use FP is not sufficient
> > > here, the problem is in all the other code that may be emitted with
> > > references to SIMD registers in it.
> > >
> > > So the only way to do this properly is to put all floating point code in
> > > a separate compilation unit, and only compile that unit with
> > > -mgeneral-regs-only. But perhaps the use of floating point here is
> > > something that should be reconsidered entirely.
> > >
> > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin at arm.com>
> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Leo Li <sunpeng.li at amd.com>
> > > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> > > Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> > > Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie>
> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
> > > Cc: Daniel Kolesa <daniel at octaforge.org>
> > > Cc: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org>
> >
> > Can rebase this on Linus' master branch?  There were a number of new
> > asics added which copy pasted the ARM64 support.
> >
>
> Not sure what you are asking me here. Reverting commit c38d444e44badc5
> on top of mainline is not going to fix the other code that was added.
> Or are you asking me to go and find the patches (how many?) that added
> new ASICs and fix them for arm64?
>
> Note that this code is critically broken, as it may corrupt user
> process state arbitrarily. So if new code was added that contains the
> same bug, it should be reverted so that the respective authors can fix
> it and resubmit.
>

Is this simply about dropping the newly added references to
$(dml_rcflags) from the Makefile? Because that is quite trivial ...