[PATCH 04/14] dt-bindings: display: bridge: Add i.MX8qm/qxp pixel combiner binding

[Liu Ying]

On Mon, 2020-12-21 at 10:02 -0700, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 9:15 PM Liu Ying <victor.liu at nxp.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 16:42 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 7:48 PM Liu Ying <victor.liu at nxp.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 12:50 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:59:23 +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> > > > > > This patch adds bindings for i.MX8qm/qxp pixel combiner.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <victor.liu at nxp.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  .../display/bridge/fsl,imx8qxp-pixel-combiner.yaml | 160
> > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 160 insertions(+)
> > > > > >  create mode 100644
> > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/fsl,imx8qxp-
> > > > > > pixel-combiner.yaml
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your
> > > > > patch:
> > > > > 
> > > > > yamllint warnings/errors:
> > > > > 
> > > > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/fsl,imx8qxp-
> > > > > pixel-combiner.example.dts:19:18: fatal error: dt-
> > > > > bindings/clock/imx8-lpcg.h: No such file or directory
> > > > >    19 |         #include <dt-bindings/clock/imx8-lpcg.h>
> > > > >       |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > > compilation terminated.
> > > > > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:342:
> > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/fsl,imx8qxp-
> > > > > pixel-combiner.example.dt.yaml] Error 1
> > > > > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > > > > make: *** [Makefile:1364: dt_binding_check] Error 2
> > > > > 
> > > > > See
> > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatchwork.ozlabs.org%2Fpatch%2F1417599&data=04%7C01%7Cvictor.liu%40nxp.com%7C7cd8e43f582b48535f8f08d8a5d235eb%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637441669585674325%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=%2BWYPU1JU4sLsE8ULeoAKvaEUBqHQAPyuydkA50%2Ffjvs%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > 
> > > > > This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a
> > > > > patch
> > > > > series is generally the most recent rc1.
> > > > 
> > > > This series can be applied to linux-next/master branch.
> > > 
> > > I can't know that to apply and run checks automatically. I guessed
> > > that reviewing this before sending, but I want it abundantly clear
> > > what the result of applying this might be and it wasn't mentioned in
> > > this patch.
> > > 
> > > Plus linux-next is a base no one can apply patches to, so should you
> > > be sending patches based on it? It's also the merge window, so maybe
> > 
> > I sent this series based on drm-misc-next.  This series is applicable
> > to linux-next/master, and may pass 'make dt_binding_check' there.
> 
> But to be clear, 'make dt_binding_check' would fail on drm-misc-next
> until 5.11-rc1 is merged in. The drm-misc maintainers need to know
> that.

Ok, will mention the dependency.  Thanks.

> 
> 
> > I'll mention dependencies in the future where similar situations
> > appear. Thanks.
> > 
> > BTW, does it make sense for the bot to additionaly try linux-next if
> > needed?  Maybe, that'll be helpful?
> 
> Sure, and when I've got nothing else to do maybe I'll do that. Though
> maintainers still need to know what the dependencies are. The real
> solution here is to make 'base-commit' tags more common or required so
> that neither scripts/bots nor humans have to guess what the base is.

Yeah, 'base-commit' is good, but a base commit should be 'well-known'
as doc[1] indicates, otherwise, it is likely unfound.  So, it seems
that linux-next is worthy of a try.

[1] https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch

Regards,
Liu Ying

> 
> Rob