[PATCH v3 3/5] ipmi: kcs: aspeed: Adapt to new LPC DTS layout

Haiyue Wang haiyue.wang at linux.intel.com
Mon Dec 21 02:59:01 EST 2020


On 12/21/2020 15:53, Haiyue Wang wrote:
> On 12/21/2020 13:56, Chia-Wei, Wang wrote:
>> Add check against LPC device v2 compatible string to
>> ensure that the fixed device tree layout is adopted.
>> The LPC register offsets are also fixed accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chia-Wei, Wang <chiawei_wang at aspeedtech.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc_aspeed.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc_aspeed.c 
>> b/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc_aspeed.c
>> index a140203c079b..6283bfef4ea7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc_aspeed.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc_aspeed.c
>> @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
>>     #define KCS_CHANNEL_MAX     4
>>   -/* mapped to lpc-bmc at 0 IO space */
>>   #define LPC_HICR0            0x000
>>   #define     LPC_HICR0_LPC3E          BIT(7)
>>   #define     LPC_HICR0_LPC2E          BIT(6)
>> @@ -52,15 +51,13 @@
>>   #define LPC_STR1             0x03C
>>   #define LPC_STR2             0x040
>>   #define LPC_STR3             0x044
>> -
>> -/* mapped to lpc-host at 80 IO space */
>> -#define LPC_HICRB            0x080
>> +#define LPC_HICRB            0x100
>>   #define     LPC_HICRB_IBFIF4         BIT(1)
>>   #define     LPC_HICRB_LPC4E          BIT(0)
>> -#define LPC_LADR4            0x090
>> -#define LPC_IDR4             0x094
>> -#define LPC_ODR4             0x098
>> -#define LPC_STR4             0x09C
>> +#define LPC_LADR4            0x110
>> +#define LPC_IDR4             0x114
>> +#define LPC_ODR4             0x118
>> +#define LPC_STR4             0x11C
>>     struct aspeed_kcs_bmc {
>>       struct regmap *map;
>> @@ -345,15 +342,25 @@ static int aspeed_kcs_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>   {
>>       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>       struct kcs_bmc *kcs_bmc;
>> -    struct device_node *np;
>> +    struct device_node *kcs_np;
>> +    struct device_node *lpc_np;
>>       int rc;
>
> I think you can just use 'np' to do LPC compatible checking:
>
> np = pdev->dev.of_node->parent;
>
> if (!of_device_is_compatible(lpc_np, "aspeed,ast2400-lpc-v2") &&
>     !of_device_is_compatible(lpc_np, "aspeed,ast2500-lpc-v2") &&
>     !of_device_is_compatible(lpc_np, "aspeed,ast2600-lpc-v2")) {
>     dev_err(dev, "unsupported LPC device binding\n");
>     return -ENODEV;
> }
>
Typo:

if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "aspeed,ast2400-lpc-v2") &&
     !of_device_is_compatible(np, "aspeed,ast2500-lpc-v2") &&
     !of_device_is_compatible(np, "aspeed,ast2600-lpc-v2")) {
     dev_err(dev, "unsupported LPC device binding\n");
     return -ENODEV;
}


>
> before:
>
> np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "aspeed,ast2400-kcs-bmc") ||
>     of_device_is_compatible(np, "aspeed,ast2500-kcs-bmc"))
>
> Then the patch is clear. ;-)
>
>> -    np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> -    if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "aspeed,ast2400-kcs-bmc") ||
>> -            of_device_is_compatible(np, "aspeed,ast2500-kcs-bmc"))
>> +    kcs_np = dev->of_node;
>> +    lpc_np = kcs_np->parent;
>> +
>> +    if (!of_device_is_compatible(lpc_np, "aspeed,ast2400-lpc-v2") &&
>> +        !of_device_is_compatible(lpc_np, "aspeed,ast2500-lpc-v2") &&
>> +        !of_device_is_compatible(lpc_np, "aspeed,ast2600-lpc-v2")) {
>> +        dev_err(dev, "unsupported LPC device binding\n");
>> +        return -ENODEV;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (of_device_is_compatible(kcs_np, "aspeed,ast2400-kcs-bmc") ||
>> +            of_device_is_compatible(kcs_np, "aspeed,ast2500-kcs-bmc"))
>>           kcs_bmc = aspeed_kcs_probe_of_v1(pdev);
>> -    else if (of_device_is_compatible(np, 
>> "aspeed,ast2400-kcs-bmc-v2") ||
>> -            of_device_is_compatible(np, "aspeed,ast2500-kcs-bmc-v2"))
>> +    else if (of_device_is_compatible(kcs_np, 
>> "aspeed,ast2400-kcs-bmc-v2") ||
>> +            of_device_is_compatible(kcs_np, 
>> "aspeed,ast2500-kcs-bmc-v2"))
>>           kcs_bmc = aspeed_kcs_probe_of_v2(pdev);
>>       else
>>           return -EINVAL;



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list