[PATCH v4 4/5] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap driver for MT6873/8192 SoCs
Nicolas Boichat
drinkcat at chromium.org
Sun Dec 20 21:42:02 EST 2020
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 8:08 PM Hsin-Hsiung Wang
<hsin-hsiung.wang at mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> MT6873/8192 are highly integrated SoCs and use PMIC_MT6359 for
> power management. This patch adds pwrap master driver to
> access PMIC_MT6359.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang at mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> index 5678f46..d1cd050 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> @@ -632,6 +632,17 @@ static int mt6797_regs[] = {
> [PWRAP_DCM_DBC_PRD] = 0x1D4,
> };
>
> +static int mt6873_regs[] = {
> + [PWRAP_INIT_DONE2] = 0x0,
I don't have the datasheet for the PWRAP interface, is this register
at offset 0x0 real?
If so, I'm concerned that mt6873_regs only defines very few registers
offsets, so the init code will do a _lot_ writes at register address
0x0 (e.g. for all the undefined values in this array: PWRAP_WACS0_EN,
PWRAP_WACS1_EN, PWRAP_WACS2_EN, etc, etc.)
> + [PWRAP_TIMER_EN] = 0x3E0,
> + [PWRAP_INT_EN] = 0x448,
> + [PWRAP_WACS2_CMD] = 0xC80,
> + [PWRAP_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0] = 0xC84,
> + [PWRAP_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0] = 0xC94,
> + [PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR] = 0xCA4,
> + [PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA] = 0xCA8,
> +};
> +
> static int mt7622_regs[] = {
> [PWRAP_MUX_SEL] = 0x0,
> [PWRAP_WRAP_EN] = 0x4,
> @@ -1050,6 +1061,7 @@ enum pwrap_type {
> PWRAP_MT6765,
> PWRAP_MT6779,
> PWRAP_MT6797,
> + PWRAP_MT6873,
> PWRAP_MT7622,
> PWRAP_MT8135,
> PWRAP_MT8173,
> @@ -1512,6 +1524,7 @@ static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
> case PWRAP_MT7622:
> pwrap_writel(wrp, 0, PWRAP_CIPHER_EN);
> break;
> + case PWRAP_MT6873:
> case PWRAP_MT8183:
> break;
> }
> @@ -1948,6 +1961,19 @@ static const struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt6797 = {
> .init_soc_specific = NULL,
> };
>
> +static const struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt6873 = {
> + .regs = mt6873_regs,
> + .type = PWRAP_MT6873,
> + .arb_en_all = 0x777f,
> + .int_en_all = BIT(4) | BIT(5),
> + .int1_en_all = 0,
> + .spi_w = PWRAP_MAN_CMD_SPI_WRITE,
> + .wdt_src = PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL,
> + .caps = PWRAP_CAP_ARB,
> + .init_reg_clock = pwrap_common_init_reg_clock,
> + .init_soc_specific = NULL,
> +};
> +
> static const struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt7622 = {
> .regs = mt7622_regs,
> .type = PWRAP_MT7622,
> @@ -2026,6 +2052,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_pwrap_match_tbl[] = {
> .compatible = "mediatek,mt6797-pwrap",
> .data = &pwrap_mt6797,
> }, {
> + .compatible = "mediatek,mt6873-pwrap",
> + .data = &pwrap_mt6873,
> + }, {
> .compatible = "mediatek,mt7622-pwrap",
> .data = &pwrap_mt7622,
> }, {
> --
> 2.6.4
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list