[PATCH v5 0/2] MTE support for KVM guest
Steven Price
steven.price at arm.com
Wed Dec 16 05:22:52 EST 2020
On 16/12/2020 07:31, Haibo Xu wrote:
[...]
> Hi Steve,
Hi Haibo
> I have finished verifying the POC on a FVP setup, and the MTE test case can
> be migrated from one VM to another successfully. Since the test case is very
> simple which just maps one page with MTE enabled and does some memory
> access, so I can't say it's OK for other cases.
That's great progress.
>
> BTW, I noticed that you have sent out patch set v6 which mentions that mapping
> all the guest memory with PROT_MTE was not feasible. So what's the plan for the
> next step? Will new KVM APIs which can facilitate the tag store and recover be
> available?
I'm currently rebasing on top of the KASAN MTE patch series. My plan for
now is to switch back to not requiring the VMM to supply PROT_MTE (so
KVM 'upgrades' the pages as necessary) and I'll add an RFC patch on the
end of the series to add an KVM API for doing bulk read/write of tags.
That way the VMM can map guest memory without PROT_MTE (so device 'DMA'
accesses will be unchecked), and use the new API for migration.
Thanks,
Steve
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list