[PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Do not replace recent_used_cpu with the new target
Mel Gorman
mgorman at techsingularity.net
Tue Dec 8 06:02:44 EST 2020
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:57:29AM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 07/12/2020 10:15, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > After select_idle_sibling, p->recent_used_cpu is set to the
> > new target. However on the next wakeup, prev will be the same as
>
> I'm confused here. Isn't current->recent_used_cpu set to 'cpu =
> smp_processor_id()' after sis()? Looking at v5.10-rc6.
If you are referring to this;
if (want_affine)
current->recent_used_cpu = cpu;
then it gets removed by the path. That replaces recent_used_cpu with the
wakers CPU which still works but the hit rate is lower.
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 23934dbac635..01b38fc17bca 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -6274,6 +6274,7 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
> >
> > /* Check a recently used CPU as a potential idle candidate: */
> > recent_used_cpu = p->recent_used_cpu;
> > + p->recent_used_cpu = prev;
> > if (recent_used_cpu != prev &&
> > recent_used_cpu != target &&
> > cpus_share_cache(recent_used_cpu, target) &&
>
> p->recent_used_cpu is already set to prev in this if condition.
>
That can be removed as redundant, I'll fix it.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list