[PATCHv5 00/12] arm64: remove set_fs() and friends

Stephen Rothwell sfr at canb.auug.org.au
Wed Dec 2 22:23:32 EST 2020

Hi Catalin,

On Wed,  2 Dec 2020 22:31:22 +0000 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com> wrote:
> Andrew, Stephen, a heads-up as the new arm64 for-next/core with the
> above patches is going to conflict with the MTE patches in -next and the
> conflict is not exactly trivial (well, mostly context changes and some
> functions renamed but there is some additional TIF_* values compacting
> in thread_info.h, otherwise the _TIF_WORK_MASK doesn't fit into an asm
> instruction). See below for my conflict resolution (next/master is
> first):

Thanks for the heads up!  I will still send out my resolutions (which
will be as you suggested).

Stephen Rothwell
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20201203/811f9a5f/attachment.sig>

More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list