[PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: defconfig: Enable interconnect for imx8mq

[Martin Kepplinger]

On 02.12.20 09:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 10:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 02:15:04PM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
>>> On 01.12.20 14:10, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>>>> On 1.12.20 14:39, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
>>>>> Enable INTERCONNECT_IMX8MQ in order to make interconnect more widely
>>>>> available for testing.
>>>>
>>>> I hope that it's not just for testing, but using it.
>>>
>>> sure, I just think that most people will use their own config for production
>>> but that's a different story. I can rephrase.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger at puri.sm>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 ++-
>>>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>>>>> index 1fed16950a7c..830c26a95b3d 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>>>>> @@ -1023,7 +1023,8 @@ CONFIG_OPTEE=y
>>>>>    CONFIG_MUX_MMIO=y
>>>>>    CONFIG_SLIM_QCOM_CTRL=m
>>>>>    CONFIG_SLIM_QCOM_NGD_CTRL=m
>>>>> -CONFIG_INTERCONNECT=y
>>>>
>>>> Why are you removing this line?
>>>
>>> savedefconfig removes it. INTERCONNECT_IMX below depends on it.
>>
>> It's save to remove it as other Interconnect options are directly
>> dependant.
> 
> Ugh, my bad, it is not allowed to remove it. My review was too fast.
> INTERCONNECT_IMX depends on it, so the INTERCONNECT must stay,
> 
> It is selected by TEGRA_MC which is independent here, so you should keep it.
> 

thanks for reviewing! Just to be clear: We're talking about defconfig, 
so if I keep INTERCONNECT that means that I do `make savedefconfig` 
which removes it (it's of course still enabled, just redundant in 
defconfig output), and then *manually* add INTERCONNECT. That would 
indicate that there's a Kconfig bug.

thanks,
                               martin