[GIT PULL] ARM: SoC fixes for v5.10, part 3

Arnd Bergmann arnd at kernel.org
Tue Dec 1 09:00:13 EST 2020

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 12:39 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org> wrote:
> So, I think we have two options. If people are willing to move to
> "disk labels" or to patch their DTBs with mmc aliases, things can stay
> as is. Otherwise, we can revert the async probe parts of the mmc host
> drivers, but that would still leave us in a fragile situation.

Can you reliably detect whether the mmc aliases in the dt exist?
If that's possible, maybe the async flag could be masked out to only have
an effect when the device number is known.


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list