[EXT] [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Fix the ENET interrupts order

[Andy Duan]

From: Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 5:05 AM
> Hi Fugang,
> 
> Could you please help review this RFC series?
> 
> My understanding is that the i.MX8M class of products are derived from
> i.MX7 from an ENET IRQ mapping perspective. (i.MX8QXP also uses the same
> i.MX7 mapping by the way). The Reference Manual also seems to indicate the
> same, but the ENET IRQ naming differs a bit between the
> i.MX7 and i.MX8MM RM's.
> 
> If this is correct, then I plan to also fix i.MX8MQ, i.MX8MN and i.MX8MP dtsi
> files.
> 
> My initial goal was to add the pps irq (patch 2/2), but then I noticed the
> potential irq mismatch and now it is a two patch series.
> 
> Thanks
It doesn't matter, since there three irq share the same irq handler, and irq handler distinguish
Irq by checking register event, so there have no explicit mapping for the three irqs, so we never
see problem. But for the fourth irq that is required for the last one, which is for pps, not for ptp4l.

Regards,
Fugang