[PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: display: mxsfb: Add and fix compatible strings
Sam Ravnborg
sam at ravnborg.org
Sun Aug 16 02:39:33 EDT 2020
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 04:29:04AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Additional compatible strings have been added in DT source for the
> i.MX6SL, i.MX6SLL, i.MX6UL and i.MX7D without updating the bindings.
> Most of the upstream DT sources use the fsl,imx28-lcdif compatible
> string, which mostly predates the realization that the LCDIF in the
> i.MX6 and newer SoCs have extra features compared to the i.MX28.
>
> Update the bindings to add the missing compatible strings, with the
> correct fallback values. This fails to validate some of the upstream DT
> sources. Instead of adding the incorrect compatible fallback to the
> binding, the sources should be updated separately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb.yaml | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb.yaml
> index 202381ec5bb7..ec6533b1d4a3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb.yaml
> @@ -15,11 +15,19 @@ description: |
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - enum:
> - - fsl,imx23-lcdif
> - - fsl,imx28-lcdif
> - - fsl,imx6sx-lcdif
> - - fsl,imx8mq-lcdif
> + oneOf:
> + - enum:
> + - fsl,imx23-lcdif
> + - fsl,imx28-lcdif
> + - fsl,imx6sx-lcdif
Indent correct.
> + - items:
> + - enum:
> + - fsl,imx6sl-lcdif
> + - fsl,imx6sll-lcdif
> + - fsl,imx6ul-lcdif
> + - fsl,imx7d-lcdif
> + - fsl,imx8mq-lcdif
Indent shall be two more spaces like above.
(This is at least my best uderstanding)
> + - const: fsl,imx6sx-lcdif
With the above the following compatibles are supported:
"fsl,imx23-lcdif"
"fsl,imx28-lcdif"
"fsl,imx6sx-lcdif"
"fsl,imx8mq-lcdif"
"fsl,imx6sl-lcdif", "fsl,imx6sx-lcdif"
"fsl,imx6sll-lcdif", "fsl,imx6sx-lcdif"
"fsl,imx6ul-lcdif", "fsl,imx6sx-lcdif"
"fsl,imx7d-lcdif", "fsl,imx6sx-lcdif"
"fsl,imx8mq-lcdif", "fsl,imx6sx-lcdif"
So the fallback value is the later "fsl,imx6sx-lcdif" which looks ok.
With indent fixed (or explained why I am wrong):
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org>
>
> reg:
> maxItems: 1
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list