[PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: s3c24xx: formatting cleanup in mach-mini2440.c
sed at free.fr
Thu Sep 13 13:26:55 PDT 2018
On 09/12/2018 09:21 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 23:54 +0200, Cedric Roux wrote:
>> scripts/checkpatch.pl -f arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-mini2440.c
>> revealed several errors and warnings.
>> They were all removed, except one which is an #if 0 around the declaration
>> of a gpio pin. This needs some more investigation and I prefer to let it
>> here. This is not some dead code.
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-mini2440.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-mini2440.c
>> @@ -674,17 +680,17 @@ static void __init mini2440_init(void)
>> mini2440_fb_info.displays =
>> - printk(KERN_INFO "MINI2440: LCD");
>> + pr_info("MINI2440: LCD");
>> for (li = 0; li < ARRAY_SIZE(mini2440_lcd_cfg); li++)
>> if (li == features.lcd_index)
>> - printk(" [%d:%dx%d]", li,
>> + pr_info(" [%d:%dx%d]", li,
>> - printk(" %d:%dx%d", li,
>> + pr_info(" %d:%dx%d", li,
>> - printk("\n");
>> + pr_info("\n");
> So only the first printk should use pr_info().
> The subsequent printk uses should use pr_cont()
at this point, I don't know what to do.
Should I resubmit the patches? Or is it in the hands of
Krzysztof (krzk at kernel.org)? I would say a git rebase -i
is enough to edit the patch and this rebase is obviously
not to be done by me, but I don't know the process.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel