[PATCH 7/8] firmware: arm_scmi: improve exit paths and code readability

Jonathan Cameron Jonathan.Cameron at huawei.com
Thu May 17 02:13:07 PDT 2018


On Wed, 9 May 2018 18:07:13 +0100
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at arm.com> wrote:

> The existing code intends the good path to reduce the code which is so
> uncommon. It's obvious to have more readable code with a goto used for
> the error path. This patch adds more appropriate error paths and makes
> code more readable. It also moves a error logging outside the scope of
> locking.
> 
> Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron at huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at arm.com>

It could be argued the lock move is unrelated and should be in a separate
patch... Not particularly important though.

Some comments inline, but I'm happy with how you did this.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron at huawei.com>

> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> index f2760a596c28..472c88ae1c0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> @@ -125,13 +125,13 @@ scmi_device_create(struct device_node *np, struct device *parent, int protocol)
>  	int id, retval;
>  	struct scmi_device *scmi_dev;
>  
> -	id = ida_simple_get(&scmi_bus_id, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (id < 0)
> -		return NULL;
> -
>  	scmi_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*scmi_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!scmi_dev)
> -		goto no_mem;
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	id = ida_simple_get(&scmi_bus_id, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (id < 0)
> +		goto free_mem;

I guess this reorder was to match what is done in remove?

Personally I would have reordered remove as that was a one line change, but
it really doesn't matter.

>  
>  	scmi_dev->id = id;
>  	scmi_dev->protocol_id = protocol;
> @@ -141,13 +141,15 @@ scmi_device_create(struct device_node *np, struct device *parent, int protocol)
>  	dev_set_name(&scmi_dev->dev, "scmi_dev.%d", id);
>  
>  	retval = device_register(&scmi_dev->dev);
> -	if (!retval)
> -		return scmi_dev;
> +	if (retval)
> +		goto put_dev;
>  
> +	return scmi_dev;

If you are respinning I'd add a blank line here for readability.

> +put_dev:
>  	put_device(&scmi_dev->dev);
> -	kfree(scmi_dev);
> -no_mem:
>  	ida_simple_remove(&scmi_bus_id, id);
> +free_mem:
> +	kfree(scmi_dev);
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> @@ -171,9 +173,9 @@ int scmi_protocol_register(int protocol_id, scmi_prot_init_fn_t fn)
>  	spin_lock(&protocol_lock);
>  	ret = idr_alloc(&scmi_protocols, fn, protocol_id, protocol_id + 1,
>  			GFP_ATOMIC);
> +	spin_unlock(&protocol_lock);
>  	if (ret != protocol_id)
>  		pr_err("unable to allocate SCMI idr slot, err %d\n", ret);
> -	spin_unlock(&protocol_lock);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list