[PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: Documentation for qcom, llcc

rishabhb at codeaurora.org rishabhb at codeaurora.org
Wed May 16 16:32:27 PDT 2018


On 2018-05-16 11:08, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting rishabhb at codeaurora.org (2018-05-16 10:33:14)
>> On 2018-05-16 10:03, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> > Quoting Rishabh Bhatnagar (2018-05-08 13:22:00)
>> 
>> >> +
>> >> +- max-slices:
>> >> +       usage: required
>> >> +       Value Type: <u32>
>> >> +       Definition: Number of cache slices supported by hardware
>> >> +
>> >> +Example:
>> >> +
>> >> +       llcc: qcom,llcc at 1100000 {
>> >
>> > cache-controller at 1100000 ?
>> >
>> We have tried to use consistent naming convention as in llcc_*
>> everywhere.
>> Using cache-controller will mix and match the naming convention. Also 
>> in
>> the documentation it is explained what llcc is and its full form.
>> 
> 
> DT prefers standard node names as opposed to vendor specific node 
> names.
> Isn't it a cache controller? I fail to see why this can't be done.
Hi Stephen,
The driver is vendor specific and also for uniformity purposes we 
preferred
to go with this name.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list