[PATCH 1/2] perf cs-etm: Support unknown_thread in cs_etm_auxtrace
Mathieu Poirier
mathieu.poirier at linaro.org
Tue May 8 10:01:30 PDT 2018
On 3 May 2018 at 09:18, Leo Yan <leo.yan at linaro.org> wrote:
> CoreSight doesn't allocate thread structure for unknown_thread in etm
> auxtrace, so unknown_thread is NULL pointer. If the perf data doesn't
> contain valid tid and then cs_etm__mem_access() uses unknown_thread
> instead as thread handler, this results in segmentation fault when
> thread__find_addr_map() accesses thread handler.
>
> This commit creates new thread data which is used by unknown_thread, so
> CoreSight tracing can roll back to use unknown_thread if perf data
> doesn't include valid thread info. This commit also releases thread
> data for initialization failure case and for normal auxtrace free flow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan at linaro.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> index 6533b1a..417302c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ static void cs_etm__free(struct perf_session *session)
> for (i = 0; i < aux->num_cpu; i++)
> zfree(&aux->metadata[i]);
>
> + thread__zput(aux->unknown_thread);
> zfree(&aux->metadata);
> zfree(&aux);
> }
> @@ -266,6 +267,7 @@ static u32 cs_etm__mem_access(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, u64 address,
> if (!thread) {
> if (cpumode != PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL)
> return -EINVAL;
> +
Extra line, please remove.
With this change:
Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org>
> thread = etmq->etm->unknown_thread;
> }
>
> @@ -1355,6 +1357,23 @@ int cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event,
> etm->auxtrace.free = cs_etm__free;
> session->auxtrace = &etm->auxtrace;
>
> + etm->unknown_thread = thread__new(999999999, 999999999);
> + if (!etm->unknown_thread)
> + goto err_free_queues;
> +
> + /*
> + * Initialize list node so that at thread__zput() we can avoid
> + * segmentation fault at list_del_init().
> + */
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&etm->unknown_thread->node);
> +
> + err = thread__set_comm(etm->unknown_thread, "unknown", 0);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_delete_thread;
> +
> + if (thread__init_map_groups(etm->unknown_thread, etm->machine))
> + goto err_delete_thread;
> +
> if (dump_trace) {
> cs_etm__print_auxtrace_info(auxtrace_info->priv, num_cpu);
> return 0;
> @@ -1369,16 +1388,18 @@ int cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event,
>
> err = cs_etm__synth_events(etm, session);
> if (err)
> - goto err_free_queues;
> + goto err_delete_thread;
>
> err = auxtrace_queues__process_index(&etm->queues, session);
> if (err)
> - goto err_free_queues;
> + goto err_delete_thread;
>
> etm->data_queued = etm->queues.populated;
>
> return 0;
>
> +err_delete_thread:
> + thread__zput(etm->unknown_thread);
> err_free_queues:
> auxtrace_queues__free(&etm->queues);
> session->auxtrace = NULL;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list