[PATCH 04/15] media: pxa_camera: remove the dmaengine compat need
Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mchehab+samsung at kernel.org
Fri May 4 12:29:32 PDT 2018
Em Sun, 22 Apr 2018 13:06:12 +0200
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil at xs4all.nl> escreveu:
> On 04/02/2018 04:26 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> > From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik at renault.com>
> >
> > As the pxa architecture switched towards the dmaengine slave map, the
> > old compatibility mechanism to acquire the dma requestor line number and
> > priority are not needed anymore.
> >
> > This patch simplifies the dma resource acquisition, using the more
> > generic function dma_request_slave_channel().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik at free.fr>
>
> Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com>
I'm assuming that you'll be applying it together with other PXA patches.
So:
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung at kernel.org>
Regards,
Mauro
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/platform/pxa_camera.c | 22 +++-------------------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/pxa_camera.c b/drivers/media/platform/pxa_camera.c
> > index c71a00736541..4c82d1880753 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/pxa_camera.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/pxa_camera.c
> > @@ -2357,8 +2357,6 @@ static int pxa_camera_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > .src_maxburst = 8,
> > .direction = DMA_DEV_TO_MEM,
> > };
> > - dma_cap_mask_t mask;
> > - struct pxad_param params;
> > char clk_name[V4L2_CLK_NAME_SIZE];
> > int irq;
> > int err = 0, i;
> > @@ -2432,34 +2430,20 @@ static int pxa_camera_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > pcdev->base = base;
> >
> > /* request dma */
> > - dma_cap_zero(mask);
> > - dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
> > - dma_cap_set(DMA_PRIVATE, mask);
> > -
> > - params.prio = 0;
> > - params.drcmr = 68;
> > - pcdev->dma_chans[0] =
> > - dma_request_slave_channel_compat(mask, pxad_filter_fn,
> > - ¶ms, &pdev->dev, "CI_Y");
> > + pcdev->dma_chans[0] = dma_request_slave_channel(&pdev->dev, "CI_Y");
> > if (!pcdev->dma_chans[0]) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't request DMA for Y\n");
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
> > - params.drcmr = 69;
> > - pcdev->dma_chans[1] =
> > - dma_request_slave_channel_compat(mask, pxad_filter_fn,
> > - ¶ms, &pdev->dev, "CI_U");
> > + pcdev->dma_chans[1] = dma_request_slave_channel(&pdev->dev, "CI_U");
> > if (!pcdev->dma_chans[1]) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't request DMA for Y\n");
> > err = -ENODEV;
> > goto exit_free_dma_y;
> > }
> >
> > - params.drcmr = 70;
> > - pcdev->dma_chans[2] =
> > - dma_request_slave_channel_compat(mask, pxad_filter_fn,
> > - ¶ms, &pdev->dev, "CI_V");
> > + pcdev->dma_chans[2] = dma_request_slave_channel(&pdev->dev, "CI_V");
> > if (!pcdev->dma_chans[2]) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't request DMA for V\n");
> > err = -ENODEV;
> >
>
Thanks,
Mauro
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list