[PATCH v2] drm/pl111: Fix module probe bug
Sean Paul
seanpaul at chromium.org
Thu May 3 07:38:19 PDT 2018
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 04:04:31PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Commit a30933c27602 ("drm/pl111: Support the Versatile Express")
> Added a second module using the builtin_platform_driver() call,
> which works fine as long as you do not try to build the PL111
> driver as a module, because a module can only have one initcall
> and cause the following build bug:
>
> (...) multiple definition of `init_module' (...)
>
> Reported-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau at arm.com>
> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll at arm.com>
> Cc: Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>
> Fixes: a30933c27602 ("drm/pl111: Support the Versatile Express")
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
> ---
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
> - In my stress I missed that if there are several CLCD instances
> on the board the platform_driver_register() call will return
> -EBUSY so we need to ignore that explicitly, all we want is to
> register the driver at least once.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_versatile.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_vexpress.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_vexpress.h | 7 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_versatile.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_versatile.c
> index 78ddf8534fd2..ad769e3e9fd3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_versatile.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_versatile.c
> @@ -326,6 +326,13 @@ int pl111_versatile_init(struct device *dev, struct pl111_drm_dev_private *priv)
> if (versatile_clcd_type == VEXPRESS_CLCD_V2M) {
> struct platform_device *pdev;
>
> + /* Registers a driver for the muxfpga */
> + ret = vexpress_muxfpga_init();
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to intialize muxfpga driver\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> /* Call into deep Vexpress configuration API */
> pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> if (!pdev) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_vexpress.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_vexpress.c
> index c9fee625faf1..c30f63cd66a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_vexpress.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_vexpress.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,6 @@ static int vexpress_muxfpga_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(map))
> return PTR_ERR(map);
> dev_set_drvdata(dev, map);
> -
nit: unrelated whitespace change
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -122,4 +121,13 @@ static struct platform_driver vexpress_muxfpga_driver = {
> .probe = vexpress_muxfpga_probe,
> };
>
> -builtin_platform_driver(vexpress_muxfpga_driver);
> +int vexpress_muxfpga_init(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = platform_driver_register(&vexpress_muxfpga_driver);
> + /* -EBUSY just means this driver is already registered */
> + if (ret && ret != -EBUSY)
> + return ret;
> + return 0;
fwiw, i think it'd be cleaner to do:
/* -EBUSY just means this driver is already registered */
if (ret == -EBUSY)
ret = 0;
return ret;
or if you're one of those people who doesn't mind inline conditionals:
/* -EBUSY just means this driver is already registered */
return ret == -EBUSY ? 0 : ret;
Anyways, just verbalizing my personal code style. With the whitespace fix,
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org>
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_vexpress.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_vexpress.h
> index 49876417f7b6..40fbe42369dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_vexpress.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_vexpress.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ int pl111_vexpress_clcd_init(struct device *dev,
> struct pl111_drm_dev_private *priv,
> struct regmap *map);
>
> +int vexpress_muxfpga_init(void);
> +
> #else
>
> static int inline pl111_vexpress_clcd_init(struct device *dev,
> @@ -19,4 +21,9 @@ static int inline pl111_vexpress_clcd_init(struct device *dev,
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> +static inline int vexpress_muxfpga_init(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #endif
> --
> 2.17.0
>
--
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list