[PATCH v3 07/10] clk: qcom: clk-cpu-8996: Prepare PLLs on probe
ilialin at codeaurora.org
ilialin at codeaurora.org
Tue Mar 20 06:53:08 PDT 2018
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 18:50
> To: Ilia Lin <ilialin at codeaurora.org>; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
> linux-arm-msm at vger.kernel.org; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org;
> sboyd at codeaurora.org
> Cc: mark.rutland at arm.com; devicetree at vger.kernel.org;
> rnayak at codeaurora.org; robh at kernel.org; will.deacon at arm.com;
> amit.kucheria at linaro.org; tfinkel at codeaurora.org; ilialin at codeaurora.org;
> nicolas.dechesne at linaro.org; celster at codeaurora.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] clk: qcom: clk-cpu-8996: Prepare PLLs on probe
>
> Quoting Ilia Lin (2018-02-14 05:59:49)
> > The PLLs must be prepared enabled during the probe to be accessible by
> > the OPPs. Otherwise an OPP may switch to non-enabled clock.
>
> Sounds like an OPP problem.
And again, it could be solved by a platform specific cpufreq driver. Worth it?
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ilia Lin <ilialin at codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c
> > b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c index 854f327..b0a3b73 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c
> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > -
> > +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>
> Please leave a newline between linux/* and local includes.
Will be changed in the next spin.
>
> > #include "clk-alpha-pll.h"
> >
> > #define VCO(a, b, c) { \
> > @@ -376,6 +376,18 @@ struct clk_hw_clks {
> > clk_alpha_pll_configure(&perfcl_alt_pll, regmap, &altpll_config);
> > clk_alpha_pll_configure(&pwrcl_alt_pll, regmap,
> > &altpll_config);
> >
> > + /* Enable all PLLs and alt PLLs */
> > + clk_prepare_enable(pwrcl_alt_pll.clkr.hw.clk);
> > + clk_prepare_enable(perfcl_alt_pll.clkr.hw.clk);
> > + clk_prepare_enable(pwrcl_pll.clkr.hw.clk);
> > + clk_prepare_enable(perfcl_pll.clkr.hw.clk);
>
> And this can't be done by the cpufreq-dt driver?
Are you suggesting changing the cpufreq-dt as well?
>
> > +
> > + /* Set initial boot frequencies for power/perf PLLs */
> > + clk_set_rate(pwrcl_alt_pll.clkr.hw.clk, 652800000);
> > + clk_set_rate(perfcl_alt_pll.clkr.hw.clk, 652800000);
> > + clk_set_rate(pwrcl_pll.clkr.hw.clk, 652800000);
> > + clk_set_rate(perfcl_pll.clkr.hw.clk, 652800000);
>
> We have assigned rates in DT for this.
I assumed that the clock driver can live without the OPP table and any cpufreq driver. Or do you mean adding this as parameters for the kryocc DT node?
>
> > +
> > ret = clk_notifier_register(pwrcl_pmux.clkr.hw.clk, &pwrcl_pmux.nb);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list