[PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a7795: sort subnodes of the cpu node
Simon Horman
horms at verge.net.au
Thu Mar 8 00:40:51 PST 2018
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Simon Horman
> <horms+renesas at verge.net.au> wrote:
> > Sort subnodes of the cpu node alphanumerically.
> >
> > This is part of an ongoing effort to provide consistent node
> > order in the DT of Renesas SoCs to improve maintainability.
> >
> > This should not have any run-time effect.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas at verge.net.au>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> > @@ -34,6 +34,50 @@
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> >
> > + a53_0: cpu at 100 {
> > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> > + reg = <0x100>;
> > + device_type = "cpu";
> > + power-domains = <&sysc R8A7795_PD_CA53_CPU0>;
> > + next-level-cache = <&L2_CA53>;
> > + enable-method = "psci";
> > + clocks =<&cpg CPG_CORE R8A7795_CLK_Z2>;
> > + operating-points-v2 = <&cluster1_opp>;
> > + };
>
> [...]
>
> > a57_0: cpu at 0 {
> > compatible = "arm,cortex-a57", "arm,armv8";
> > reg = <0x0>;
>
> Given the CPU nodes do have reg properties and unit addresses, shouldn't
> they be sorted by these values, instead of alphabetically?
Thanks, I agree.
It looks like the nodes are already sorted according to that order
so I withdraw this patch.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list