[PATCH v3] pwm: mediatek: fix up PWM4 and PWM5 malfunction on MT7623
Sean Wang
sean.wang at mediatek.com
Fri Mar 2 14:34:50 PST 2018
On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 11:57 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:19:12PM +0800, sean.wang at mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Sean Wang <sean.wang at mediatek.com>
> >
> > Since the offset for both registers, PWMDWIDTH and PWMTHRES, used to
> > control PWM4 or PWM5 are distinct from the other PWMs, whose wrong
> > programming on PWM hardware causes waveform cannot be output as expected.
> > Thus, the patch adds the extra condition for fixing up the weird case to
> > let PWM4 or PWM5 able to work on MT7623.
> >
> > v1 -> v2: use pwm45_fixup naming instead of pwm45_quirk
> > v2 -> v3: add more tags for Reviewed-by, Fixes, and Cc stable
> >
> > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: caf065f8fd58 ("pwm: Add MediaTek PWM support")
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang at mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg at gmail.com>
> > Cc: Zhi Mao <zhi.mao at mediatek.com>
> > Cc: John Crispin <john at phrozen.org>
> > Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
> [...]
> > @@ -151,9 +156,18 @@ static int mtk_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + if (pc->soc->pwm45_fixup && pwm->hwpwm > 2) {
> > + /*
> > + * PWM[4,5] has distinct offset for PWMDWIDTH and PWMTHRES
> > + * from the other PWMs on MT7623.
> > + */
> > + reg_width = PWM45DWIDTH_FIXUP;
> > + reg_thres = PWM45THRES_FIXUP;
> > + }
>
> I don't understand this. According to the condition above the above
> would also use the PWM[4,5] "fixup" register offsets with PWM[3]. Should
> the condition be pwm->hwpwm > 3?
>
> Thierry
PWM[4,5] are the naming specified in datasheet and kept it as is here
and driver or userspace would use index 3 and 4 to have a reference to
them respectively.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list