[PATCH 16/16] arm64: Add work around for Arm Cortex-A55 Erratum 1024718
Suzuki K Poulose
Suzuki.Poulose at arm.com
Fri Jan 26 08:29:53 PST 2018
On 26/01/18 15:33, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:28:09PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> Some variants of the Arm Cortex-55 cores (r0p0, r0p1, r1p0) suffer
>> from an erratum 1024718, which causes incorrect updates when DBM/AP
>> bits in a page table entry is modified without a break-before-make
>> sequence. The work around is to skip enabling the hardware DBM feature
>> on the affected cores. The hardware Access Flag management features
>> is not affected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> index 8af755b8219d..64f1e911c6af 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> @@ -914,9 +914,21 @@ static inline void __cpu_enable_hw_dbm(void)
>> isb();
>> }
>>
>> +static bool cpu_has_erratum_1024718(void)
>> +{
>> + static const struct midr_range __maybe_unused cpus[] = {
>
> Do you need __maybe_unused? If #ifdef were used here then
> __maybe_unused would be needed, but I thought that if code is optimised
> out instead of conditionally copiled, this didn't apply.
Yep. I don't know if the compiler could optimise the array itself with
the tag as a hint. I will double check.
>
>> + MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A55, 0, 0, 1, 0), // A55 r0p0 -r1p0
>> + {},
>> + };
>> +
>> + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1024718) &&
>> + is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), cpus);
>
> Why have a list with just one entry? Do you expect more entries over
> time?
Yes. I should have mentioned it here. See [1]
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-January/554516.html
Cheers
Suzuki
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list