[PATCH v3 3/4] gpio: raspberrypi-exp: Driver for RPi3 GPIO expander via mailbox service
Stefan Wahren
stefan.wahren at i2se.com
Fri Jan 19 10:50:07 PST 2018
Hi Baruch,
> Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il> hat am 16. Januar 2018 um 13:45 geschrieben:
>
>
> From: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson at raspberrypi.org>
>
> Pi3 and Compute Module 3 have a GPIO expander that the
> VPU communicates with.
> There is a mailbox service that now allows control of this
> expander, so add a kernel driver that can make use of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson at raspberrypi.org>
> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il>
> ---
> v3:
> * Tweak Kconfig driver prompt
> * Make GPIO_RASPBERRYPI_EXP tristate
> * Make COMPILE_TEST independent of RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE
> * Remove redundant DMA header
> * Use less code lines for dev_err()
> * Check rpi_exp_gpio_get_polarity() return value
> * Remove redundant platform_set_drvdata() call
>
> v2:
> * Rename driver to gpio-raspberrypi-exp
> * Populate the gpiochip parent device pointer
> * Use macro for the mailbox base GPIO number
> * Drop linux/gpio.h and GPIOF_DIR_*
> * Check and print firmware error value
> * Use devm_gpiochip_add_data(); drop .remove
> * A few more minor tweaks
> ---
> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 9 ++
> drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c | 253 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 263 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c
>
> ...
> +
> +static int rpi_exp_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct device_node *fw_node;
> + struct rpi_firmware *fw;
> + struct rpi_exp_gpio *rpi_gpio;
> +
> + fw_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "firmware", 0);
> + if (!fw_node) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Missing firmware node\n");
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + fw = rpi_firmware_get(fw_node);
> + if (!fw)
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +
> + rpi_gpio = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rpi_gpio), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rpi_gpio)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + rpi_gpio->fw = fw;
> + rpi_gpio->gc.parent = dev;
> + rpi_gpio->gc.label = MODULE_NAME;
> + rpi_gpio->gc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + rpi_gpio->gc.of_node = np;
> + rpi_gpio->gc.base = -1;
> + rpi_gpio->gc.ngpio = NUM_GPIO;
> +
> + rpi_gpio->gc.direction_input = rpi_exp_gpio_dir_in;
> + rpi_gpio->gc.direction_output = rpi_exp_gpio_dir_out;
> + rpi_gpio->gc.get_direction = rpi_exp_gpio_get_direction;
> + rpi_gpio->gc.get = rpi_exp_gpio_get;
> + rpi_gpio->gc.set = rpi_exp_gpio_set;
> + rpi_gpio->gc.can_sleep = true;
> +
> + return devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &rpi_gpio->gc, rpi_gpio);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id rpi_exp_gpio_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "raspberrypi,firmware-gpio" },
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rpi_exp_gpio_ids);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver rpi_exp_gpio_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = MODULE_NAME,
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
i assume you got the kbuild test robot mail about this. So please remove this and you can add my
Reviewed-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren at i2se.com>
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(rpi_exp_gpio_ids),
> + },
> + .probe = rpi_exp_gpio_probe,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(rpi_exp_gpio_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson at raspberrypi.org>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Raspberry Pi 3 expander GPIO driver");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:rpi-exp-gpio");
> --
> 2.15.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list