[PATCH v6 01/13] arm64: cpufeature: __this_cpu_has_cap() shouldn't stop early

[Suzuki K Poulose]

On 16/01/18 15:04, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 07:38:54PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> index 9ef84d0def9a..d88cd0e88606 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> @@ -1303,8 +1303,8 @@ static bool __this_cpu_has_cap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap_array,
>>   	if (WARN_ON(preemptible()))
>>   		return false;
>>   
>> -	for (caps = cap_array; caps->desc; caps++)
>> -		if (caps->capability == cap && caps->matches)
>> +	for (caps = cap_array; caps->matches; caps++)
>> +		if (caps->capability == cap)
>>   			return caps->matches(caps, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU);
>>   
>>   	return false;
> 
> Just to make sure I applied this correctly on top of for-next/core:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index a11311397430..630a40ec1332 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -1149,9 +1149,8 @@ static bool __this_cpu_has_cap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap_array,
>   	if (WARN_ON(preemptible()))
>   		return false;
>   
> -	for (caps = cap_array; caps->desc; caps++)
> +	for (caps = cap_array; caps->matches; caps++)
>   		if (caps->capability == cap &&
> -		    caps->matches &&
>   		    caps->matches(caps, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU))
>   			return true;
>   	return false;
> 

Looks correct to me.

Thanks
Suzuki