[PATCH v2 3/4] gpio: raspberrypi-exp: Driver for RPi3 GPIO expander via mailbox service
Stefan Wahren
stefan.wahren at i2se.com
Sun Jan 14 02:42:57 PST 2018
Hi Baruch,
> Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il> hat am 14. Januar 2018 um 07:08 geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Thanks for reviewing. Please find below a few questions.
>
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 11:33:15AM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > + default RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE
> > > + depends on OF_GPIO && RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE && \
> > > + (ARCH_BCM2835 || COMPILE_TEST)
> >
> > Since this is default on RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE, we could remove it from the dependencies.
>
> This driver does not work when RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE is not enabled. So the
> driver should not be selectable, regardless of its default enable/disable
> state.
I know. My idea was to increase build test coverage. Nevertheless the more common style would be:
depends on ARCH_BCM2835 || COMPILE_TEST
depends on OF_GPIO && RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE
>
> > > + help
> > > + Turn on GPIO support for the expander on Raspberry Pi 3 boards, using
> > > + the firmware mailbox to communicate with VideoCore on BCM283x chips.
> > > +
>
> [...]
>
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > > +/*
> > > + * Raspberry Pi 3 expander GPIO driver
> > > + *
> > > + * Uses the firmware mailbox service to communicate with the
> > > + * GPIO expander on the VPU.
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright (C) 2017 Raspberry Pi Trading Ltd.
> >
> > 2018?
>
> Why? Raspberry Pi Trading Ltd added no code to this driver in 2018.
Sure. Don't you want to add your copyright?
>
> [...]
>
> > > +static struct platform_driver rpi_exp_gpio_driver = {
> > > + .driver = {
> > > + .name = MODULE_NAME,
> > > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >
> > Please drop this, too.
>
> Why? Recent GPIO drivers include this line.
I don't know which driver your are referring to, but platform driver doesn't need this.
Please grep for all platform_driver in gpio and you won't see any setting of ownership. I'm not speaking about the gpiochip.
Btw my replies to #2 and #4 got blocked, should i try to resend it to you.
Thanks
Stefan
> I have seen no commits removing
> .owner from GPIO drivers in mainline or in current development tree.
>
> baruch
>
> --
> http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
> =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
> - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list