[PATCH v2 3/4] gpio: raspberrypi-exp: Driver for RPi3 GPIO expander via mailbox service
Peter Robinson
pbrobinson at gmail.com
Sat Jan 13 06:49:44 PST 2018
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren at i2se.com> wrote:
> Hi Baruch,
>
>> Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il> hat am 11. Januar 2018 um 20:44 geschrieben:
>>
>>
>> From: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson at raspberrypi.org>
>>
>> Pi3 and Compute Module 3 have a GPIO expander that the
>> VPU communicates with.
>> There is a mailbox service that now allows control of this
>> expander, so add a kernel driver that can make use of it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson at raspberrypi.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> * Rename driver to gpio-raspberrypi-exp
>> * Populate the gpiochip parent device pointer
>> * Use macro for the mailbox base GPIO number
>> * Drop linux/gpio.h and GPIOF_DIR_*
>> * Check and print firmware error value
>> * Use devm_gpiochip_add_data(); drop .remove
>> * A few more minor tweaks
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 9 ++
>> drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c | 258 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 268 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
>> index d6a8e851ad13..8df901c75bef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
>> @@ -128,6 +128,15 @@ config GPIO_AXP209
>> help
>> Say yes to enable GPIO support for the AXP209 PMIC
>>
>> +config GPIO_RASPBERRYPI_EXP
>> + bool "RaspberryPi 3 Exp GPIO"
>
> How about "RaspberryPi 3 GPIO Expander" ?
>
> Why not tristate? On arm64 it's preferred to have a kernel module.
And on all generic distros, like Fedora, that cater for generic
kernels with support for 100s of devices where most things are modular
to keep the kernel as small as possible.
>> + default RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE
>> + depends on OF_GPIO && RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE && \
>> + (ARCH_BCM2835 || COMPILE_TEST)
>
> Since this is default on RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE, we could remove it from the dependencies.
>
>> + help
>> + Turn on GPIO support for the expander on Raspberry Pi 3 boards, using
>> + the firmware mailbox to communicate with VideoCore on BCM283x chips.
>> +
>> config GPIO_BCM_KONA
>> bool "Broadcom Kona GPIO"
>> depends on OF_GPIO && (ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || COMPILE_TEST)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
>> index 4bc24febb889..71021b0e71da 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ARIZONA) += gpio-arizona.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ATH79) += gpio-ath79.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ASPEED) += gpio-aspeed.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_AXP209) += gpio-axp209.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_RASPBERRYPI_EXP) += gpio-raspberrypi-exp.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BCM_KONA) += gpio-bcm-kona.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BD9571MWV) += gpio-bd9571mwv.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BRCMSTB) += gpio-brcmstb.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..95b1957a69fa
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>> +/*
>> + * Raspberry Pi 3 expander GPIO driver
>> + *
>> + * Uses the firmware mailbox service to communicate with the
>> + * GPIO expander on the VPU.
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Raspberry Pi Trading Ltd.
>
> 2018?
>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>
> I can't see any DMA handling, so please remove it.
>
>> +#include <soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h>
>> +
>> +#define MODULE_NAME "raspberrypi-exp-gpio"
>> +#define NUM_GPIO 8
>> +
>> +#define RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE 128
>> +
>> +#define RPI_EXP_GPIO_DIR_IN 0
>> +#define RPI_EXP_GPIO_DIR_OUT 1
>> +
>> +struct rpi_exp_gpio {
>> + struct gpio_chip gc;
>> + struct rpi_firmware *fw;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* VC4 firmware mailbox interface data structures */
>> +
>> +struct gpio_set_config {
>> + u32 gpio;
>> + u32 direction;
>> + u32 polarity;
>> + u32 term_en;
>> + u32 term_pull_up;
>> + u32 state;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct gpio_get_config {
>> + u32 gpio;
>> + u32 direction;
>> + u32 polarity;
>> + u32 term_en;
>> + u32 term_pull_up;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct gpio_get_set_state {
>> + u32 gpio;
>> + u32 state;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int rpi_exp_gpio_get_polarity(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)
>> +{
>> + struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
>> + struct gpio_get_config get;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>> +
>> + get.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE; /* GPIO to update */
>> +
>> + ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_GPIO_CONFIG,
>> + &get, sizeof(get));
>> + if (ret || get.gpio != 0) {
>> + dev_err(gc->parent,
>> + "Failed to get GPIO %u config (%d %x)\n", off, ret,
>> + get.gpio);
>
> Can't we change this to fit in 2 lines?
>
>> + return ret ? ret : -EIO;
>> + }
>> + return get.polarity;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rpi_exp_gpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)
>> +{
>> + struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
>> + struct gpio_set_config set_in;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>> +
>> + set_in.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE; /* GPIO to update */
>> + set_in.direction = RPI_EXP_GPIO_DIR_IN;
>> + set_in.polarity = rpi_exp_gpio_get_polarity(gc, off);
>
> This could fail, so please check the return code.
>
>> + /* Retain existing setting */
>> + set_in.term_en = 0; /* termination disabled */
>> + set_in.term_pull_up = 0; /* n/a as termination disabled */
>> + set_in.state = 0; /* n/a as configured as an input */
>> +
>> + ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_GPIO_CONFIG,
>> + &set_in, sizeof(set_in));
>> + if (ret || set_in.gpio != 0) {
>> + dev_err(gc->parent,
>> + "Failed to set GPIO %u to input (%d %x)\n",
>> + off, ret, set_in.gpio);
>
> see above
>
>> + return ret ? ret : -EIO;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rpi_exp_gpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off, int val)
>> +{
>> + struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
>> + struct gpio_set_config set_out;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>> +
>> + set_out.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE; /* GPIO to update */
>> + set_out.direction = RPI_EXP_GPIO_DIR_OUT;
>> + set_out.polarity = rpi_exp_gpio_get_polarity(gc, off);
>
> This could also fail.
>
>> + /* Retain existing setting */
>> + set_out.term_en = 0; /* n/a as an output */
>> + set_out.term_pull_up = 0; /* n/a as termination disabled */
>> + set_out.state = val; /* Output state */
>> +
>> + ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_GPIO_CONFIG,
>> + &set_out, sizeof(set_out));
>> + if (ret || set_out.gpio != 0) {
>> + dev_err(gc->parent,
>> + "Failed to set GPIO %u to output (%d %x)\n", off, ret,
>> + set_out.gpio);
>> + return ret ? ret : -EIO;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rpi_exp_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)
>> +{
>> + struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
>> + struct gpio_get_config get;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>> +
>> + get.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE; /* GPIO to update */
>> +
>> + ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_GPIO_CONFIG,
>> + &get, sizeof(get));
>> + if (ret || get.gpio != 0) {
>> + dev_err(gc->parent,
>> + "Failed to get GPIO %u config (%d %x)\n", off, ret,
>> + get.gpio);
>> + return ret ? ret : -EIO;
>> + }
>> + return !get.direction;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rpi_exp_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)
>> +{
>> + struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
>> + struct gpio_get_set_state get;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>> +
>> + get.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE; /* GPIO to update */
>> + get.state = 0; /* storage for returned value */
>> +
>> + ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_GPIO_STATE,
>> + &get, sizeof(get));
>> + if (ret || get.gpio != 0) {
>> + dev_err(gc->parent,
>> + "Failed to get GPIO %u state (%d %x)\n", off, ret,
>> + get.gpio);
>> + return ret ? ret : -EIO;
>> + }
>> + return !!get.state;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void rpi_exp_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off, int val)
>> +{
>> + struct rpi_exp_gpio *gpio;
>> + struct gpio_get_set_state set;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>> +
>> + set.gpio = off + RPI_EXP_GPIO_BASE; /* GPIO to update */
>> + set.state = val; /* Output state */
>> +
>> + ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_GPIO_STATE,
>> + &set, sizeof(set));
>> + if (ret || set.gpio != 0)
>> + dev_err(gc->parent,
>> + "Failed to set GPIO %u state (%d %x)\n", off, ret,
>> + set.gpio);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rpi_exp_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + int err = 0;
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> + struct device_node *fw_node;
>> + struct rpi_firmware *fw;
>> + struct rpi_exp_gpio *rpi_gpio;
>> +
>> + fw_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "firmware", 0);
>> + if (!fw_node) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Missing firmware node\n");
>> + return -ENOENT;
>> + }
>> +
>> + fw = rpi_firmware_get(fw_node);
>> + if (!fw)
>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> +
>> + rpi_gpio = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rpi_gpio), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!rpi_gpio)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + rpi_gpio->fw = fw;
>> + rpi_gpio->gc.parent = dev;
>> + rpi_gpio->gc.label = MODULE_NAME;
>> + rpi_gpio->gc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>> + rpi_gpio->gc.of_node = np;
>> + rpi_gpio->gc.base = -1;
>> + rpi_gpio->gc.ngpio = NUM_GPIO;
>> +
>> + rpi_gpio->gc.direction_input = rpi_exp_gpio_dir_in;
>> + rpi_gpio->gc.direction_output = rpi_exp_gpio_dir_out;
>> + rpi_gpio->gc.get_direction = rpi_exp_gpio_get_direction;
>> + rpi_gpio->gc.get = rpi_exp_gpio_get;
>> + rpi_gpio->gc.set = rpi_exp_gpio_set;
>> + rpi_gpio->gc.can_sleep = true;
>> +
>> + err = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &rpi_gpio->gc, rpi_gpio);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rpi_gpio);
>
> Since we use devm_gpiochip_add_data, we can drop this.
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id rpi_exp_gpio_ids[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "raspberrypi,firmware-gpio" },
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rpi_exp_gpio_ids);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver rpi_exp_gpio_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = MODULE_NAME,
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>
> Please drop this, too.
>
> Thanks
> Stefan
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-rpi-kernel mailing list
> linux-rpi-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rpi-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list