[PATCH, v3] arm: omap2: timer: fix a kmemleak caused in omap_get_timer_dt
Keerthy
j-keerthy at ti.com
Fri Jan 12 14:27:28 PST 2018
On 1/13/2018 2:47 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>
> On 01/12/2018 03:08 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko at ti.com> [180112 20:36]:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On 01/10/2018 10:54 PM, Qi Hou wrote:
>>>> When more than one GP timers are used as kernel system timers and the
>>>> corresponding nodes in device-tree are marked with the same "disabled"
>>>> property, then the "attr" field of the property will be initialized
>>>> more than once as the property being added to sys file system via
>>>> __of_add_property_sysfs().
>>>>
>>>> In __of_add_property_sysfs(), the "name" field of pp->attr.attr is set
>>>> directly to the return value of safe_name(), without taking care of
>>>> whether it's already a valid pointer to a memory block. If it is, its
>>>> old value will always be overwritten by the new one and the memory
>>>> block
>>>> allocated before will a "ghost", then a kmemleak happened.
>>>>
>>>> That the same "disabled" property being added to different nodes of
>>>> device
>>>> tree would cause that kind of kmemleak overhead, at leat once.
>>>>
>>>> To fix it, allocate the property dynamically, and delete static one.
>>>
>>> Does it in sync with Keerthy's work [1]
>>
>> First fixes, then new stuff! Keerthy's work will have to
>> wait for v4.17, we want that series sitting in Linux next
>> for several weeks.
>>
> Np. just want to be sure every party is aware about each other's work
Thanks Grygorii. I am not touching the mach-omap2 timer.c file as part
of my migration series.
I applied the above patch and it seems my series applies cleanly after
this patch. Compiled fine.
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list