[PATCH -next] IIO: ADC: fix return value check in stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe()

[Arnaud Pouliquen]

On 01/12/2018 02:37 AM, weiyongjun (A) wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:12:41AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
>>> In case of error, the function devm_iio_device_alloc() returns NULL
>>> pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check
>>> should be replaced with NULL test.
>>>
>>> Fixes: e2e6771c6462 ("IIO: ADC: add STM32 DFSDM sigma delta ADC
>> support")
>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1 at huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-
>> dfsdm-adc.c
>>> index e628d04..5e87140 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
>>> @@ -1100,9 +1100,9 @@ static int stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>  	dev_data = (const struct stm32_dfsdm_dev_data *)of_id->data;
>>>
>>>  	iio = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*adc));
>>> -	if (IS_ERR(iio)) {
>>> +	if (!iio) {
>>>  		dev_err(dev, "%s: Failed to allocate IIO\n", __func__);
>>> -		return PTR_ERR(iio);
>>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>>>  	}
>>>
>>>  	adc = iio_priv(iio);
>>         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> This one doesn't return an error pointer either.  The check causes a
>> static check warning for me.  (It can't actually fail, though so maybe
>> it will return an error pointer in the future?)
> 
> It seems that we can simply remove the check since 'adc' can never
> be an invalid address here.

Agree, i'm preparing patches for all issue you highlight,

Thanks for all your remarks
Arnaud
> 
> Regards,
> Yongjun Wei
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>