[PATCH 2/9] iommu/rockchip: Fix error handling in attach
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Thu Jan 11 07:47:27 PST 2018
On 11/01/18 08:22, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga at chromium.org>
>
> Currently if the driver encounters an error while attaching device, it
> will leave the IOMMU in an inconsistent state. Even though it shouldn't
> really happen in reality, let's just add proper error path to keep
> things consistent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga at chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen at rock-chips.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
> index 9d991c2d8767..ee805e1dfba7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
> @@ -826,17 +826,10 @@ static int rk_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>
> ret = rk_iommu_force_reset(iommu);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto err_disable_stall;
>
> iommu->domain = domain;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_irq; i++) {
> - ret = devm_request_irq(iommu->dev, iommu->irq[i], rk_iommu_irq,
> - IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev), iommu);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_mmu; i++) {
> rk_iommu_write(iommu->bases[i], RK_MMU_DTE_ADDR,
> rk_domain->dt_dma);
> @@ -844,9 +837,16 @@ static int rk_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> rk_iommu_write(iommu->bases[i], RK_MMU_INT_MASK, RK_MMU_IRQ_MASK);
> }
>
> + for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_irq; i++) {
> + ret = devm_request_irq(iommu->dev, iommu->irq[i], rk_iommu_irq,
> + IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev), iommu);
Why aren't we simply requesting the IRQ once in rk_iommu_probe()? Given
that the hardware doesn't handle multiple translation contexts, there
doesn't seem to be much point in being this dynamic about it.
Robin.
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_free_irq;
> + }
> +
> ret = rk_iommu_enable_paging(iommu);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto err_free_irq;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&rk_domain->iommus_lock, flags);
> list_add_tail(&iommu->node, &rk_domain->iommus);
> @@ -857,6 +857,14 @@ static int rk_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> rk_iommu_disable_stall(iommu);
>
> return 0;
> +
> +err_free_irq:
> + while (i--)
> + devm_free_irq(iommu->dev, iommu->irq[i], iommu);
> +err_disable_stall:
> + rk_iommu_disable_stall(iommu);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void rk_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list