[PATCH] dmaengine: mv_xor_v2: Fix clock resource by adding a register clock

Gregory CLEMENT gregory.clement at bootlin.com
Tue Feb 27 07:19:56 PST 2018


Hi Vinod,
 
 On mar., févr. 27 2018, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at intel.com> wrote:

> Pls do CC DT folks and Rob for bindings update
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:27:33PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> On the CP110 components whic are present on the Armada 7K/8K SoC we need
>
> /s/whic/which
>
>> to explicitly enable the registers clock. However it is not needed for
>
> /s/registers/register
>
>> the AP8xx componenet, that's why this clock is optional.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement at bootlin.com>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/dma/mv-xor-v2.txt          |  6 +++++-
>>  drivers/dma/mv_xor_v2.c                            | 23 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/mv-xor-v2.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/mv-xor-v2.txt
>> index 217a90eaabe7..9c38bbe7e6d7 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/mv-xor-v2.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/mv-xor-v2.txt
>> @@ -11,7 +11,11 @@ Required properties:
>>    interrupts.
>>  
>>  Optional properties:
>> -- clocks: Optional reference to the clock used by the XOR engine.
>> +- clocks: Optional reference to the clocks used by the XOR engine.
>> +- clock-names: mandatory if there is a second clock, in this case the
>> +   name must be "core" for the first clock and "reg" for the second
>> +   one
>> +
>>  
>>  Example:
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/mv_xor_v2.c b/drivers/dma/mv_xor_v2.c
>> index f652a0e0f5a2..93b3d80ce701 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/mv_xor_v2.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/mv_xor_v2.c
>> @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ struct mv_xor_v2_device {
>>  	void __iomem *dma_base;
>>  	void __iomem *glob_base;
>>  	struct clk *clk;
>> +	struct clk *reg_clk;
>>  	struct tasklet_struct irq_tasklet;
>>  	struct list_head free_sw_desc;
>>  	struct dma_device dmadev;
>> @@ -749,13 +750,24 @@ static int mv_xor_v2_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	if (ret)
>>  		return ret;
>>  
>> -	xor_dev->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>> -	if (IS_ERR(xor_dev->clk) && PTR_ERR(xor_dev->clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> +	xor_dev->reg_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "reg");
>
> is this an exiting property?

It is the name of the new optional clock described in the first part of
this patch.

About the typo, do you need a new version or do you plan to fix them
while applying the patch?

Thanks,

Gregory


>
>> +	if (!IS_ERR(xor_dev->reg_clk)) {
>> +		ret = clk_prepare_enable(xor_dev->reg_clk);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +	} else if (PTR_ERR(xor_dev->reg_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>>  		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	xor_dev->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(xor_dev->clk) && PTR_ERR(xor_dev->clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>> +		ret = EPROBE_DEFER;
>> +		goto disable_reg_clk;
>> +	}
>>  	if (!IS_ERR(xor_dev->clk)) {
>>  		ret = clk_prepare_enable(xor_dev->clk);
>>  		if (ret)
>> -			return ret;
>> +			goto disable_reg_clk;
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	ret = platform_msi_domain_alloc_irqs(&pdev->dev, 1,
>> @@ -866,8 +878,9 @@ static int mv_xor_v2_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  free_msi_irqs:
>>  	platform_msi_domain_free_irqs(&pdev->dev);
>>  disable_clk:
>> -	if (!IS_ERR(xor_dev->clk))
>> -		clk_disable_unprepare(xor_dev->clk);
>> +	clk_disable_unprepare(xor_dev->clk);
>> +disable_reg_clk:
>> +	clk_disable_unprepare(xor_dev->reg_clk);
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.15.1
>> 
>
> -- 
> ~Vinod
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Gregory Clement, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list