[PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: arm: Document Renesas R-Car M3-N-based Salvator-X board

Simon Horman horms at verge.net.au
Tue Feb 27 00:22:39 PST 2018


On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 07:03:44PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The Renesas Salvator-X development board can be equipped with an R-Car
> H3, M3-W, or M3-N SiP, which are pin-compatible.
> 
> Document board part number and compatible values for the version with
> R-Car M3-N.
> 
> The board part number was extracted from a big patch by Takeshi Kihara
> in the BSP.

That I have verified.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas at glider.be>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt
> index 82908a9447e4b051..51e4428856be4557 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt
> @@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ Boards:
>      compatible = "renesas,salvator-x", "renesas,r8a7795"
>    - Salvator-X (RTP0RC7796SIPB0011S)

Here we have: Name (Part No)

>      compatible = "renesas,salvator-x", "renesas,r8a7796"
> +  - Salvator-X (RTP0RC7796SIPB0011S (M3N))

Here we have: Name (Part No (SoC))

> +    compatible = "renesas,salvator-x", "renesas,r8a77965"
>    - Salvator-XS (Salvator-X 2nd version, RTP0RC7795SIPB0012S)

And here we have: Name (Version, Part No)

>      compatible = "renesas,salvator-xs", "renesas,r8a7795"
>    - Salvator-XS (Salvator-X 2nd version, RTP0RC7796SIPB0012S)

Can we think about making this more consistent?



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list